3.4 sec in total
875 ms
2.3 sec
191 ms
Visit cagewebdev.com now to see the best up-to-date CAGE Web Dev content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cagewebdev.com
CAGE Web Design Do you want to present your company on the Internet? Do you want to give your current site a face lift? Do you want your site to look elegant and professional? CAGE WILL DO THE JOB! Wh...
Visit cagewebdev.comWe analyzed Cagewebdev.com page load time and found that the first response time was 875 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
cagewebdev.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value140 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value6.2 s
61/100
10%
875 ms
184 ms
181 ms
188 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Cagewebdev.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (875 ms) belongs to the original domain Cagewebdev.com.
Page size can be reduced by 673.7 kB (49%)
1.4 MB
688.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Cagewebdev.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 653.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CAGE Web Dev images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 449.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 449.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 196.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cagewebdev.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 196.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (80%)
46
9
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CAGE Web Dev. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cagewebdev.com
875 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
184 ms
float-to-top-button.min.css
181 ms
style.css
188 ms
font-awesome.min.css
190 ms
quick-style.php
523 ms
preset4.css
199 ms
css
24 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
280 ms
jquery.js
406 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
286 ms
processing.min.js
568 ms
rr_rocket_reader_fe.min.css
227 ms
jquery.scrollUp.min.js
313 ms
float-to-top-button.min.js
311 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
422 ms
masonry.min.js
495 ms
bootstrap.min.js
504 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
442 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
523 ms
main.js
544 ms
wp-embed.min.js
548 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
591 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
589 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
601 ms
core.min.js
623 ms
widget.min.js
645 ms
mouse.min.js
652 ms
resizable.min.js
685 ms
draggable.min.js
687 ms
button.min.js
693 ms
position.min.js
722 ms
dialog.min.js
749 ms
rr_rocket_reader.min.js
754 ms
style.css
671 ms
bootstrap.min.css
135 ms
prettyPhoto.css
112 ms
font-awesome.min.css
108 ms
main.css
115 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
logocage120.png
166 ms
keyboard2_1170.jpg
282 ms
home_circuit_board-1024x245.jpg
192 ms
deepdream720.jpg
451 ms
rolf180.jpg
167 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
26 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
123 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
126 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
124 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
125 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
124 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
125 ms
MEz38VLIFL-t46JUtkIEgH4UHu-c0cTZKOwO_f6u1Os.ttf
123 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
126 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
390 ms
collect
100 ms
arrow003.png
102 ms
cagewebdev.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
cagewebdev.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cagewebdev.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cagewebdev.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cagewebdev.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cagewebdev.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CAGE Web Dev. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: