Tools & Wizards About Us
cajolepage.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

cajolepage.com

日本免费在线视频a|免费观看电的a片中文|日韩视频6页在线观看|日韩女人自慰片在线试看

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

396 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

62 ms

cajolepage.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cajolepage.com homepage info - get ready to check Cajolepage best content right away, or after learning these important things about cajolepage.com

日本免费在线视频a|免费观看电的a片中文|日韩视频6页在线观看|日韩女人自慰片在线试看|天天想天天射天天日|www.cajolepage.com|黄色成人网站免费网址|亚洲无码国内有码

Visit cajolepage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cajolepage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 396 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cajolepage.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

87/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

396 ms

push.js

673 ms

common.js

74 ms

tj.js

142 ms

0.gif

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Cajolepage.com, 40% (4 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com and 20% (2 requests) were made to Sstatic1.histats.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Hm.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 kB (42%)

Content Size

3.3 kB

After Optimization

1.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cajolepage.com main page is 3.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 667 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 626 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 667 B or 52% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 704 B

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 704 B or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (44%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cajolepage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

index.php

index.php

396 ms

push.js

push.js

673 ms

common.js

common.js

74 ms

tj.js

tj.js

142 ms

0.gif

0.gif

45 ms

hm.js

hm.js

1562 ms

hm.js

hm.js

1574 ms

0.gif

0.gif

44 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

299 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

309 ms

Accessibility Review

cajolepage.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cajolepage.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

cajolepage.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    GB2312

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cajolepage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Cajolepage.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

cajolepage.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cajolepage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: