3.1 sec in total
222 ms
2.1 sec
842 ms
Welcome to calitreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Calit Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about calitreview.com
Visit calitreview.comWe analyzed Calitreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
calitreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value9.4 s
1/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value4,150 ms
1/100
30%
Value1.042
2/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
222 ms
158 ms
670 ms
1691 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Calitreview.com, 16% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 13% (8 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Calitreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 450.2 kB (25%)
1.8 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Calitreview.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 383.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Calit Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 383.3 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 40.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Calitreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77 B or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (21%)
58
46
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Calit Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
calitreview.com
222 ms
158 ms
switch.js
670 ms
calitreview%3Cdiv%20id=
1691 ms
recent_comments_widget.js
55 ms
pinit.js
22 ms
branding.css
23 ms
poweredby_FFFFFF.gif
16 ms
the_godfather_hp.jpg
40 ms
mad_men_hp2.jpg
41 ms
TN-ChildrenofMen.jpg
38 ms
the_godfather_part_ii_hp.jpg
40 ms
goodfellas_hp.jpg
36 ms
on_the_waterfront_hp.jpg
55 ms
pulp_fiction_hp.jpg
54 ms
little_caesar_hp.jpg
56 ms
VeronicaGonzalezPe%C3%B1a.jpg
105 ms
sp_hp.jpg
62 ms
Civil-War-hp.jpg
67 ms
blue_hp.jpg
67 ms
Civil-War_hp1.jpg
78 ms
Civil-War_hp.jpg
77 ms
orphans_hp.jpg
80 ms
sfb_hp.jpg
82 ms
sf_brussels_marine_hp.jpg
90 ms
sf_london_VivianAndNagehan-hp.jpg
92 ms
sf_brussels_kimi_hp.jpg
94 ms
sf_sydney_DannyTruong_hp.jpg
94 ms
sf_london_melissa_hp.jpg
101 ms
branding.css
61 ms
likebox.php
245 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
165 ms
kTub4bakEmM.css
204 ms
FAHeNGXgPup.js
280 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
346 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
312 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
313 ms
416948_10150575301657621_45918858_n.jpg
223 ms
10392062_119688247620_1251523_n.jpg
263 ms
215461_106503266100782_3088496_n.jpg
303 ms
10354644_1453578441555950_2608356229377249044_n.jpg
331 ms
12805762_987640031328502_5786575702362539754_n.jpg
332 ms
1382231_10153364391626220_115824475592377029_n.jpg
343 ms
11257951_631653750299952_1671347899373122140_n.jpg
339 ms
10632716_10152281309316821_8237793128245065027_n.jpg
338 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
60 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
60 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
86 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
101 ms
logo-jz.gif
54 ms
masthead1-jz.gif
54 ms
twitter32.png
56 ms
rss-img.gif
57 ms
rss.png
58 ms
facebook.png
58 ms
pintrest.png
60 ms
avatar92.jpg
34 ms
avatar92.jpg
31 ms
avatar92.jpg
32 ms
noavatar92.png
31 ms
count.js
21 ms
pinit_main.js
58 ms
calitreview.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
calitreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
calitreview.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Calitreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Calitreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
calitreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Calit Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: