Tools & Wizards About Us
call-recorder.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 46

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

call-recorder.net

iPhone Call Recorder - Call Recording iOS App iCall

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

197 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

448 ms

call-recorder.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Call Recorder content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about call-recorder.net

Call recorder app iCall will easily help you record your personal and business calls for any purpose. You will not find any add in this app.

Visit call-recorder.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Call-recorder.net page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

call-recorder.net performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

96/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.234

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

call-recorder.net

197 ms

js

159 ms

hotjar-1466310.js

103 ms

amplitude-4.5.2-min.gz.js

35 ms

owl.carousel.css

124 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Call-recorder.net, 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (822 ms) belongs to the original domain Call-recorder.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 162.0 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Call-recorder.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 53.4 kB

  • Original 78.0 kB
  • After minification 72.9 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 101.8 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 927.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Call Recorder images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 66.4 kB
  • After minification 66.4 kB
  • After compression 60.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 431 B

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Call-recorder.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (50%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Call Recorder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

call-recorder.net

call-recorder.net

197 ms

js

js

159 ms

hotjar-1466310.js

hotjar-1466310.js

103 ms

amplitude-4.5.2-min.gz.js

amplitude-4.5.2-min.gz.js

35 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

124 ms

style.css

style.css

142 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

46 ms

scroll-to-min.js

scroll-to-min.js

173 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

153 ms

global.js

global.js

138 ms

img-logo.png

img-logo.png

425 ms

group-15-copy.png

group-15-copy.png

250 ms

apple1-png-2-x.png

apple1-png-2-x.png

261 ms

img-mobile.png

img-mobile.png

284 ms

ic_1_2.png

ic_1_2.png

275 ms

ic_2_2.png

ic_2_2.png

308 ms

ic_3_2.png

ic_3_2.png

389 ms

ic_1.png

ic_1.png

379 ms

ic_2.png

ic_2.png

412 ms

ic_3.png

ic_3.png

417 ms

ic_4.png

ic_4.png

471 ms

apple-png-2-x.png

apple-png-2-x.png

495 ms

ic_logo.png

ic_logo.png

822 ms

button_white_small.png

button_white_small.png

549 ms

modules.84f80a92c39bbd76564a.js

modules.84f80a92c39bbd76564a.js

14 ms

img.png

img.png

413 ms

ic-arrow-down@3x.png

ic-arrow-down@3x.png

386 ms

ic-star.png

ic-star.png

692 ms

checkmark.svg

checkmark.svg

397 ms

js

js

102 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

Proxima%20Nova%20Bold.woff

Proxima%20Nova%20Bold.woff

451 ms

Proxima%20Nova%20Regular.woff

Proxima%20Nova%20Regular.woff

530 ms

js

js

52 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

collect

collect

82 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

194 ms

Accessibility Review

call-recorder.net accessibility score

46

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

call-recorder.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

call-recorder.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Call-recorder.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Call-recorder.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

call-recorder.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Call Recorder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: