Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

callercomplaints.com

Run Background Checks Online With an Advanced Background Check Service

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

672 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

688 ms

callercomplaints.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Callercomplaints content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about callercomplaints.com

Visit callercomplaints.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Callercomplaints.com page load time and found that the first response time was 672 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

callercomplaints.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.callercomplaints.com

672 ms

caller_complaints.css

230 ms

jquery.min.js

9 ms

validation.js

426 ms

buttons.js

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Callercomplaints.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (672 ms) belongs to the original domain Callercomplaints.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 218.0 kB (54%)

Content Size

407.3 kB

After Optimization

189.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Callercomplaints.com main page is 407.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 278.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 71.8 kB

  • Original 85.4 kB
  • After minification 74.5 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.9 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Callercomplaints images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 111.8 kB

  • Original 278.4 kB
  • After minification 263.8 kB
  • After compression 166.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.8 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 34.4 kB

  • Original 41.0 kB
  • After minification 29.0 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Callercomplaints.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (57%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Callercomplaints. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

callercomplaints.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

callercomplaints.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

callercomplaints.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Callercomplaints.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Callercomplaints.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Callercomplaints. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: