5.7 sec in total
63 ms
2.8 sec
2.8 sec
Click here to check amazing CallX content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about callx.com
Visit callx.comWe analyzed Callx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
callx.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value1,560 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.102
89/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
63 ms
30 ms
44 ms
30 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Callx.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (204 ms) belongs to the original domain Callx.com.
Page size can be reduced by 204.4 kB (11%)
1.9 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Callx.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 170.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CallX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Callx.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (82%)
89
16
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CallX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.callx.com
63 ms
theme.min.css
30 ms
style.css
44 ms
frontend.css
30 ms
style.min.css
33 ms
header-footer.min.css
27 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
23 ms
post-19.css
33 ms
public.css
34 ms
custom-jet-blocks.css
49 ms
jet-elements.css
51 ms
jet-elements-skin.css
36 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
37 ms
swiper.min.css
39 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
41 ms
jet-tricks-frontend.css
42 ms
global.css
43 ms
post-1334.css
64 ms
post-1498.css
60 ms
post-1872.css
67 ms
post-2496.css
68 ms
post-1663.css
71 ms
post-1300.css
68 ms
css
59 ms
fontawesome.min.css
60 ms
regular.min.css
72 ms
solid.min.css
65 ms
jquery.min.js
110 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
80 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
68 ms
widget-animated-headline.min.css
81 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
69 ms
post-3082.css
68 ms
e-gallery.min.css
94 ms
post-3418.css
74 ms
post-1645.css
75 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
75 ms
api.js
75 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
88 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
56 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
56 ms
hooks.min.js
56 ms
vue.min.js
57 ms
jet-menu-public-scripts.js
66 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
50 ms
e-gallery.min.js
66 ms
slick.min.js
70 ms
jet-plugins.js
204 ms
frontend.js
198 ms
make-column-clickable.js
203 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
61 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
196 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
188 ms
i18n.min.js
185 ms
frontend.min.js
176 ms
waypoints.min.js
175 ms
core.min.js
171 ms
frontend.min.js
181 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
180 ms
jet-blocks.min.js
171 ms
jet-elements.min.js
179 ms
widgets-scripts.js
178 ms
popperjs.js
170 ms
tippy-bundle.js
173 ms
jet-tricks-frontend.js
172 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
170 ms
underscore.min.js
171 ms
wp-util.min.js
170 ms
frontend.min.js
167 ms
Frame-37993.jpg
24 ms
footer-logo.svg
24 ms
overlay-bg.svg
79 ms
teeth-whiten-1-e1671009008553-1024x962.png
28 ms
Ellipse-20.svg
76 ms
Brand-icon.svg
78 ms
Brand-icon-2.svg
87 ms
Brand-icon-1.svg
88 ms
Brand-icon-3.svg
81 ms
google-1.jpg
79 ms
Icon-3.svg
86 ms
image-292.jpg
79 ms
google.jpg
80 ms
Rectangle-6579-1.jpg
80 ms
Rectangle-6631.jpg
77 ms
Rectangle-6581-1.jpg
75 ms
Rectangle-6579.jpg
75 ms
Rectangle-6580.jpg
76 ms
Rectangle-6581.jpg
75 ms
contact-us-bg.svg
75 ms
recaptcha__en.js
111 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
34 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
34 ms
eicons.woff
33 ms
callx.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
callx.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
callx.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Callx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Callx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
callx.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CallX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: