Tools & Wizards About Us
caltr.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

caltr.com

International Cargo Transportation Air and Ocean Shipment From U.S.A. to Japan | Trading and International Cargo Forwarding CALBRIDGE TRADING

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

324 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

160 ms

caltr.com screenshot

About Website

Visit caltr.com now to see the best up-to-date Caltr content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about caltr.com

International Cargo Transportation Air and Ocean Shipment From U.S.A. to Japan Trading and International Cargo Forwarding CALBRIDGE TRADING

Visit caltr.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Caltr.com page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

caltr.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,090 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

caltr.com

324 ms

basic.css

153 ms

top.css

219 ms

plusone.js

25 ms

widgets.js

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Caltr.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Caltr.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 346.9 kB (43%)

Content Size

812.5 kB

After Optimization

465.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Caltr.com main page is 812.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 395.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 15.0 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 68.0 kB
  • After minification 68.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Caltr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 334.0 kB
  • After minification 334.0 kB
  • After compression 331.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 333.5 kB

  • Original 395.5 kB
  • After minification 391.9 kB
  • After compression 62.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Caltr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 333.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (41%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

41

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Caltr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

caltr.com

caltr.com

324 ms

basic.css

basic.css

153 ms

top.css

top.css

219 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

25 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

45 ms

ga.js

ga.js

115 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

108 ms

-Lyq3p0CQgQ

-Lyq3p0CQgQ

201 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

589 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

138 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

154 ms

header_bg.gif

header_bg.gif

256 ms

header_logo.gif

header_logo.gif

257 ms

header_txt1.gif

header_txt1.gif

257 ms

header_link4j.gif

header_link4j.gif

256 ms

header_link1-1.gif

header_link1-1.gif

270 ms

header_link2.gif

header_link2.gif

582 ms

header_link3.gif

header_link3.gif

581 ms

header_mail.gif

header_mail.gif

583 ms

header_tell.gif

header_tell.gif

582 ms

head_tab01c.jpg

head_tab01c.jpg

582 ms

head_tab02a.jpg

head_tab02a.jpg

582 ms

head_tab03a.jpg

head_tab03a.jpg

621 ms

head_tab04a.jpg

head_tab04a.jpg

778 ms

head_tab05a.jpg

head_tab05a.jpg

670 ms

head_tab06a.jpg

head_tab06a.jpg

670 ms

head_tab07a.jpg

head_tab07a.jpg

670 ms

head_tab08a.jpg

head_tab08a.jpg

777 ms

head_tab09a.jpg

head_tab09a.jpg

873 ms

topimage.jpg

topimage.jpg

1107 ms

top_notice.jpg

top_notice.jpg

907 ms

top_h2_1.gif

top_h2_1.gif

862 ms

top_h3_1.gif

top_h3_1.gif

886 ms

top_point1.gif

top_point1.gif

966 ms

top_point2.gif

top_point2.gif

1042 ms

top_point3.gif

top_point3.gif

1058 ms

top_point4.gif

top_point4.gif

1075 ms

top_point5.gif

top_point5.gif

1103 ms

top_img1.gif

top_img1.gif

1386 ms

top_h2_2.gif

top_h2_2.gif

1227 ms

top_h3_2.gif

top_h3_2.gif

1243 ms

top_btn.gif

top_btn.gif

1227 ms

top_h3_3.gif

top_h3_3.gif

1254 ms

top_h3_4.gif

top_h3_4.gif

1304 ms

top_img3.gif

top_img3.gif

1413 ms

btn_rtntop.gif

btn_rtntop.gif

1427 ms

footer_bg.gif

footer_bg.gif

1373 ms

like.php

like.php

512 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

53 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

32 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

9 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

30 ms

base.js

base.js

118 ms

544727282-postmessagerelay.js

544727282-postmessagerelay.js

83 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

69 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

613 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

13 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

311 ms

hTLn9eGvHolBoYZEIgYnhFeXt5RSKUh7mTOIAh8Y734.js

hTLn9eGvHolBoYZEIgYnhFeXt5RSKUh7mTOIAh8Y734.js

146 ms

embed.js

embed.js

62 ms

y-w6ncCxpsQ.js

y-w6ncCxpsQ.js

77 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

76 ms

settings

settings

257 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

152 ms

id

id

31 ms

Create

Create

112 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

40 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

14 ms

embeds

embeds

53 ms

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.ja.html

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.ja.html

45 ms

head_tab02b.jpg

head_tab02b.jpg

95 ms

head_tab03b.jpg

head_tab03b.jpg

153 ms

top_btn_b.gif

top_btn_b.gif

186 ms

btn_rtntop_b.gif

btn_rtntop_b.gif

187 ms

Accessibility Review

caltr.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

caltr.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

caltr.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Caltr.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Caltr.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

caltr.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Caltr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: