Tools & Wizards About Us
cambridgeproofreading.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

cambridgeproofreading.com

Cambridge Proofreading LLC | Rated 4.9 on TrustPilot | 2,713 reviews

Page Load Speed

438 ms in total

First Response

33 ms

Resources Loaded

405 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

cambridgeproofreading.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cambridge Proofreading content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cambridgeproofreading.com

Cambridge Proofreading provides subject-specialist proofreading and editing services. The best quality, fairest prices, and a 100% guarantee.

Visit cambridgeproofreading.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cambridgeproofreading.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 405 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cambridgeproofreading.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.101

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cambridgeproofreading.com

33 ms

proofreading.org

154 ms

style.css

187 ms

front.min.css

134 ms

email-decode.min.js

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cambridgeproofreading.com, 50% (3 requests) were made to Proofreading.b-cdn.net and 33% (2 requests) were made to Proofreading.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (187 ms) relates to the external source Proofreading.b-cdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 224.7 kB (79%)

Content Size

283.9 kB

After Optimization

59.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cambridgeproofreading.com main page is 283.9 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 283.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 224.7 kB

  • Original 283.3 kB
  • After minification 283.3 kB
  • After compression 58.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 224.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cambridge Proofreading. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

cambridgeproofreading.com

cambridgeproofreading.com

33 ms

proofreading.org

proofreading.org

154 ms

style.css

style.css

187 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

134 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

5 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

144 ms

Accessibility Review

cambridgeproofreading.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

cambridgeproofreading.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cambridgeproofreading.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cambridgeproofreading.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cambridgeproofreading.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cambridgeproofreading.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: