Tools & Wizards About Us
camelbackinn.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

camelbackinn.com

Camelback Resort | JW Marriott Scottsdale Camelback Inn Resort & Spa

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

camelbackinn.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to camelbackinn.com homepage info - get ready to check Camelback Inn best content right away, or after learning these important things about camelbackinn.com

Reserve your next Paradise Valley vacation at the lavish JW Marriott Scottsdale Camelback Inn Resort & Spa, the best Camelback resort.

Visit camelbackinn.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Camelbackinn.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

camelbackinn.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value18,680 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.062

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value56.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

camelbackinn.com

46 ms

www.camelbackinn.com

45 ms

319 ms

marriottCommon.js

115 ms

caf4601d10406f938b23f5e9f0ee55b0f0aafa2feb045

207 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Camelbackinn.com, 57% (26 requests) were made to Marriott.com and 33% (15 requests) were made to Cache.marriott.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (851 ms) relates to the external source Marriott.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (26%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Camelbackinn.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 260.9 kB

  • Original 304.5 kB
  • After minification 251.0 kB
  • After compression 43.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 53.5 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 260.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 697 B

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Camelback Inn images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 837.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 330.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 837.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (61%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Camelback Inn. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

camelbackinn.com

camelbackinn.com

46 ms

www.camelbackinn.com

www.camelbackinn.com

45 ms

319 ms

marriottCommon.js

marriottCommon.js

115 ms

caf4601d10406f938b23f5e9f0ee55b0f0aafa2feb045

caf4601d10406f938b23f5e9f0ee55b0f0aafa2feb045

207 ms

ruxitagentjs_ICA7NQVfhqrux_10289240325103055.js

ruxitagentjs_ICA7NQVfhqrux_10289240325103055.js

252 ms

datalayer

datalayer

259 ms

clientlib-base.min.569a20d572bd560535b3c0a54ddfbdfc.css

clientlib-base.min.569a20d572bd560535b3c0a54ddfbdfc.css

222 ms

clientlib-firstpaint.min.ff1dd744f8ee9528d2371d919b9912e9.css

clientlib-firstpaint.min.ff1dd744f8ee9528d2371d919b9912e9.css

171 ms

clientlib-firstpaint.min.194b8e0dd0c3b53c0d4d0f114716b4cd.js

clientlib-firstpaint.min.194b8e0dd0c3b53c0d4d0f114716b4cd.js

144 ms

clientlib-sitev2.min.65611a1c7c2009848d999da09de2b0f9.css

clientlib-sitev2.min.65611a1c7c2009848d999da09de2b0f9.css

170 ms

clientlib-bptv2.min.6b3d0a3536455c94aaa9d7f9dd6d7adb.css

clientlib-bptv2.min.6b3d0a3536455c94aaa9d7f9dd6d7adb.css

201 ms

clientlibs.d317a5d9bbba6e3a517179296858ca98.css

clientlibs.d317a5d9bbba6e3a517179296858ca98.css

200 ms

clientlib-hws-jquery.min.4709cf7b87b5f9ad6240b012a8445143.js

clientlib-hws-jquery.min.4709cf7b87b5f9ad6240b012a8445143.js

219 ms

launch-EN1ce795381cea451fa40478e502ecce2f.min.js

launch-EN1ce795381cea451fa40478e502ecce2f.min.js

43 ms

clientlibs.min.d317a5d9bbba6e3a517179296858ca98.css

clientlibs.min.d317a5d9bbba6e3a517179296858ca98.css

218 ms

clientlibs.min.958566c0926591bb80f15142808a328b.js

clientlibs.min.958566c0926591bb80f15142808a328b.js

389 ms

clientlibs.min.514eb65f7113da6dfcbaa39ce4be0cb9.js

clientlibs.min.514eb65f7113da6dfcbaa39ce4be0cb9.js

417 ms

clientlibs.958566c0926591bb80f15142808a328b.js

clientlibs.958566c0926591bb80f15142808a328b.js

388 ms

clientlib-base.min.97809428e8a7697927b484e808804291.js

clientlib-base.min.97809428e8a7697927b484e808804291.js

453 ms

clientlib-sitev2.min.12b01cda97d90e6fc8dfc54fdc4b721e.js

clientlib-sitev2.min.12b01cda97d90e6fc8dfc54fdc4b721e.js

849 ms

clientlib-bptv2.min.bb7b78d697f12ab7be82f6cc91e4be3e.js

clientlib-bptv2.min.bb7b78d697f12ab7be82f6cc91e4be3e.js

850 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

388 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

851 ms

bv.js

bv.js

27 ms

sPH0EiPys

sPH0EiPys

412 ms

marriottCommon.js

marriottCommon.js

379 ms

jw_logo_L_W.png

jw_logo_L_W.png

329 ms

jw_logo_L.png

jw_logo_L.png

318 ms

phxcb-resort-casita-7905-hor-clsc.jpg

phxcb-resort-casita-7905-hor-clsc.jpg

376 ms

phxcb-lobby-5994-hor-clsc.jpg

phxcb-lobby-5994-hor-clsc.jpg

317 ms

jw-phxcb-jw-phxcb-1-2022-pool-mumm-10703:Classic-Hor

jw-phxcb-jw-phxcb-1-2022-pool-mumm-10703:Classic-Hor

704 ms

phxcb-golf-0161-hor-clsc.jpg

phxcb-golf-0161-hor-clsc.jpg

702 ms

phxcb-golf-0163-hor-clsc.jpg

phxcb-golf-0163-hor-clsc.jpg

511 ms

phxcb-golf-0162-hor-clsc.jpg

phxcb-golf-0162-hor-clsc.jpg

514 ms

phxcb-pool-0131-hor-clsc.jpg

phxcb-pool-0131-hor-clsc.jpg

508 ms

jw-phxcb-fitness-17969:Classic-Hor

jw-phxcb-fitness-17969:Classic-Hor

702 ms

JW_Griffin.png

JW_Griffin.png

315 ms

Swiss721BT-Medium.woff

Swiss721BT-Medium.woff

432 ms

Swiss721BT-Bold.woff

Swiss721BT-Bold.woff

435 ms

Swiss721BT-Regular.woff

Swiss721BT-Regular.woff

434 ms

mi-icons.woff

mi-icons.woff

621 ms

mi-brand-logo-icons.woff

mi-brand-logo-icons.woff

622 ms

456 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

197 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

195 ms

Accessibility Review

camelbackinn.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

camelbackinn.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

camelbackinn.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Camelbackinn.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Camelbackinn.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

camelbackinn.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Camelback Inn. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: