Tools & Wizards About Us
camera-club.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

camera-club.net

Padiham & District Photographic Society | Padiham Camera Club

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

520 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

168 ms

camera-club.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to camera-club.net homepage info - get ready to check Camera Club best content right away, or after learning these important things about camera-club.net

Visit camera-club.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Camera-club.net page load time and found that the first response time was 520 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

camera-club.net performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.camera-club.net

520 ms

sdm_wp_styles.css

85 ms

um-gallery.min.css

166 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

229 ms

jquery-ui.css

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Camera-club.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (751 ms) belongs to the original domain Camera-club.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 106.5 kB (15%)

Content Size

707.5 kB

After Optimization

601.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Camera-club.net main page is 707.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 331.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 83.6 kB

  • Original 101.4 kB
  • After minification 101.1 kB
  • After compression 17.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 274.8 kB
  • After minification 255.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Camera Club images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 331.3 kB
  • After minification 331.3 kB
  • After compression 327.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (91%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Camera Club. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.camera-club.net

www.camera-club.net

520 ms

sdm_wp_styles.css

sdm_wp_styles.css

85 ms

um-gallery.min.css

um-gallery.min.css

166 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

229 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

15 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

238 ms

um-modal.min.css

um-modal.min.css

241 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

241 ms

tipsy.min.css

tipsy.min.css

238 ms

um-raty.min.css

um-raty.min.css

243 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

304 ms

um-fileupload.min.css

um-fileupload.min.css

314 ms

um-confirm.min.css

um-confirm.min.css

315 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

316 ms

default.date.min.css

default.date.min.css

316 ms

default.time.min.css

default.time.min.css

323 ms

fonticons-ii.min.css

fonticons-ii.min.css

382 ms

fonticons-fa.min.css

fonticons-fa.min.css

391 ms

um-fontawesome.min.css

um-fontawesome.min.css

391 ms

common.min.css

common.min.css

393 ms

um-responsive.min.css

um-responsive.min.css

393 ms

um-styles.min.css

um-styles.min.css

400 ms

cropper.min.css

cropper.min.css

461 ms

um-profile.min.css

um-profile.min.css

466 ms

um-account.min.css

um-account.min.css

467 ms

um-misc.min.css

um-misc.min.css

470 ms

um-old-default.min.css

um-old-default.min.css

472 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

490 ms

client-clock.js

client-clock.js

547 ms

sdm_wp_scripts.js

sdm_wp_scripts.js

552 ms

um-gdpr.min.js

um-gdpr.min.js

553 ms

jquery.timepicker.min.css

jquery.timepicker.min.css

573 ms

fdatepicker.min.css

fdatepicker.min.css

573 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

574 ms

jquery.autocomplete.css

jquery.autocomplete.css

640 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

640 ms

text-security-disc.css

text-security-disc.css

641 ms

eme.css

eme.css

647 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

571 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

497 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

496 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

493 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

495 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

495 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

499 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

498 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

498 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

494 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

496 ms

um-gallery.min.js

um-gallery.min.js

580 ms

us.core.min.js

us.core.min.js

586 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

502 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

510 ms

tipsy.min.js

tipsy.min.js

502 ms

um-confirm.min.js

um-confirm.min.js

499 ms

picker.min.js

picker.min.js

516 ms

picker.date.min.js

picker.date.min.js

591 ms

picker.time.min.js

picker.time.min.js

586 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

524 ms

cropper.min.js

cropper.min.js

522 ms

common-frontend.min.js

common-frontend.min.js

523 ms

um-modal.min.js

um-modal.min.js

524 ms

jquery-form.min.js

jquery-form.min.js

594 ms

fileupload.js

fileupload.js

566 ms

um-functions.min.js

um-functions.min.js

577 ms

um-responsive.min.js

um-responsive.min.js

583 ms

um-conditional.min.js

um-conditional.min.js

574 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

579 ms

en.js

en.js

587 ms

um-raty.min.js

um-raty.min.js

586 ms

um-scripts.min.js

um-scripts.min.js

565 ms

um-profile.min.js

um-profile.min.js

570 ms

um-account.min.js

um-account.min.js

585 ms

jquery.timepicker.min.js

jquery.timepicker.min.js

595 ms

fdatepicker.min.js

fdatepicker.min.js

596 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

669 ms

eme.js

eme.js

564 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

563 ms

resizable.min.js

resizable.min.js

576 ms

draggable.min.js

draggable.min.js

591 ms

controlgroup.min.js

controlgroup.min.js

590 ms

checkboxradio.min.js

checkboxradio.min.js

626 ms

button.min.js

button.min.js

571 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

592 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

710 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

662 ms

return-to-past-700.jpeg

return-to-past-700.jpeg

751 ms

rss.png

rss.png

552 ms

Accessibility Review

camera-club.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

SEO Factors

camera-club.net SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Camera-club.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Camera-club.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

camera-club.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Camera Club. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: