Tools & Wizards About Us
campshalom.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

campshalom.net

CAMP SHALOM RETREAT CAMPGROUNDS

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

783 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

799 ms

campshalom.net screenshot

About Website

Visit campshalom.net now to see the best up-to-date CAMP SHALOM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about campshalom.net

Visit campshalom.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Campshalom.net page load time and found that the first response time was 783 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

campshalom.net performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

campshalom.net

783 ms

bootstrap.css

143 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

92 ms

style.css

98 ms

css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Campshalom.net, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (892 ms) belongs to the original domain Campshalom.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (19%)

Content Size

7.6 MB

After Optimization

6.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Campshalom.net main page is 7.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 26.3 kB

  • Original 32.7 kB
  • After minification 29.1 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 928.4 kB

  • Original 6.9 MB
  • After minification 6.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, CAMP SHALOM needs image optimization as it can save up to 928.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 261.3 kB

  • Original 381.1 kB
  • After minification 341.2 kB
  • After compression 119.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 204.5 kB

  • Original 249.3 kB
  • After minification 193.1 kB
  • After compression 44.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Campshalom.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 204.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (63%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CAMP SHALOM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

campshalom.net

campshalom.net

783 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

143 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

92 ms

style.css

style.css

98 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

43 ms

css

css

45 ms

css

css

46 ms

css

css

46 ms

cnss.css

cnss.css

91 ms

jrsm.css

jrsm.css

92 ms

styles.css

styles.css

128 ms

responsiveslides.css

responsiveslides.css

129 ms

wprmenu.css

wprmenu.css

136 ms

css

css

14 ms

css

css

21 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

173 ms

style.css

style.css

150 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

248 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

165 ms

cnss.js

cnss.js

177 ms

jrsm-jquery.js

jrsm-jquery.js

195 ms

responsiveslides.min.js

responsiveslides.min.js

194 ms

jquery.transit.min.js

jquery.transit.min.js

208 ms

jquery.sidr.js

jquery.sidr.js

215 ms

wprmenu.js

wprmenu.js

220 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

235 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

230 ms

bootstrap-transition.js

bootstrap-transition.js

224 ms

bootstrap-alert.js

bootstrap-alert.js

225 ms

bootstrap-modal.js

bootstrap-modal.js

226 ms

bootstrap-dropdown.js

bootstrap-dropdown.js

226 ms

bootstrap-scrollspy.js

bootstrap-scrollspy.js

231 ms

bootstrap-tab.js

bootstrap-tab.js

229 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.js

bootstrap-tooltip.js

231 ms

bootstrap-popover.js

bootstrap-popover.js

229 ms

bootstrap-button.js

bootstrap-button.js

232 ms

bootstrap-collapse.js

bootstrap-collapse.js

230 ms

bootstrap-carousel.js

bootstrap-carousel.js

269 ms

bootstrap-typeahead.js

bootstrap-typeahead.js

270 ms

holder.js

holder.js

270 ms

jquery.countdown.css

jquery.countdown.css

271 ms

jquery.ui.core.min.js

jquery.ui.core.min.js

278 ms

jquery.ui.widget.min.js

jquery.ui.widget.min.js

277 ms

jquery.ui.mouse.min.js

jquery.ui.mouse.min.js

278 ms

jquery.ui.sortable.min.js

jquery.ui.sortable.min.js

280 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

311 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

310 ms

functions.js

functions.js

311 ms

jquery.countdown.js

jquery.countdown.js

311 ms

countdown.js

countdown.js

307 ms

wood_background.png

wood_background.png

892 ms

logo.png

logo.png

181 ms

day_bg.png

day_bg.png

476 ms

nav_bg.png

nav_bg.png

474 ms

primary-nav-divider.png

primary-nav-divider.png

558 ms

slide-61.png

slide-61.png

730 ms

slide-4.png

slide-4.png

710 ms

btn_stone_bg.png

btn_stone_bg.png

473 ms

content_bg.jpg

content_bg.jpg

474 ms

image_frame.png

image_frame.png

480 ms

6.png

6.png

475 ms

3.png

3.png

470 ms

white_bg.png

white_bg.png

456 ms

21.jpg

21.jpg

500 ms

1398256437_i-icon.png

1398256437_i-icon.png

512 ms

1398256418_f_icon.png

1398256418_f_icon.png

538 ms

1398256427_t-icon.png

1398256427_t-icon.png

542 ms

bottom.jpg

bottom.jpg

731 ms

img_1.png

img_1.png

621 ms

img_2.png

img_2.png

664 ms

img_3.png

img_3.png

713 ms

img_4.png

img_4.png

729 ms

myunderwood-webfont.woff

myunderwood-webfont.woff

669 ms

JzRrPKdwEnE8F1TDmDLMUhxcROG_7vu2ubkyRjqgeRY.ttf

JzRrPKdwEnE8F1TDmDLMUhxcROG_7vu2ubkyRjqgeRY.ttf

16 ms

img_5.png

img_5.png

751 ms

bottom_contact_bg.png

bottom_contact_bg.png

709 ms

footer_logo.png

footer_logo.png

713 ms

sprites.png

sprites.png

545 ms

Accessibility Review

campshalom.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

campshalom.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

campshalom.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Campshalom.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Campshalom.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

campshalom.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CAMP SHALOM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: