3.5 sec in total
137 ms
2.8 sec
550 ms
Click here to check amazing Cancer Institute content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cancerinstitute.com
Cancer treatment and resources for patients and their families in Northeast Louisiana
Visit cancerinstitute.comWe analyzed Cancerinstitute.com page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
cancerinstitute.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.039
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
87/100
10%
137 ms
230 ms
1945 ms
43 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Cancerinstitute.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.googleapis.com.
Page size can be reduced by 33.3 kB (16%)
202.6 kB
169.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Cancerinstitute.com main page is 202.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 113.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cancer Institute images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 405 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (11%)
27
24
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cancer Institute. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
cancerinstitute.com
137 ms
cancerinstitute.com
230 ms
css2
1945 ms
jquery.min.js
43 ms
shadowbox.js
58 ms
functions.js
110 ms
js
91 ms
logo.svg
105 ms
misc-submenuarrow.svg
56 ms
icon-menu.svg
56 ms
icon-contact.svg
109 ms
icon-donate.svg
110 ms
icon-physician.svg
161 ms
icon-calendar.svg
163 ms
misc-gradient.png
159 ms
bg-video.jpg
209 ms
wave.svg
259 ms
home-doctors.webp
165 ms
icon-imaging.svg
215 ms
icon-treatment.svg
211 ms
icon-services.svg
213 ms
icon-novalis.svg
217 ms
home-technology.webp
266 ms
wave-dark.svg
360 ms
staff-jamesadams.webp
420 ms
staff-lacey-amos.webp
266 ms
icon-lock.svg
268 ms
icon-facebook.svg
314 ms
icon-close.svg
316 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff
38 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff
49 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfCLw.woff
52 ms
cancerinstitute.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cancerinstitute.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
cancerinstitute.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cancerinstitute.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cancerinstitute.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cancerinstitute.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cancer Institute. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: