Tools & Wizards About Us
candidatedirect.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

candidatedirect.net

Quality, Compliant Background Screenings | IntelliCorp | A Cisive Company

Page Load Speed

497 ms in total

First Response

109 ms

Resources Loaded

315 ms

Page Rendered

73 ms

candidatedirect.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to candidatedirect.net homepage info - get ready to check Candidatedirect best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about candidatedirect.net

Our commitment to quality, compliant background screenings is expressed through our service to you, giving you the confidence you need to make informed decisions.

Visit candidatedirect.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Candidatedirect.net page load time and found that the first response time was 109 ms and then it took 388 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Candidatedirect.net rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

candidatedirect.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

candidatedirect.net

109 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

25 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

11 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

17 ms

css2

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Candidatedirect.net, 44% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (109 ms) belongs to the original domain Candidatedirect.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 546 B (3%)

Content Size

19.2 kB

After Optimization

18.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Candidatedirect.net main page is 19.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 18.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 356 B

  • Original 866 B
  • After minification 866 B
  • After compression 510 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 356 B or 41% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 190 B

  • Original 18.4 kB
  • After minification 18.4 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Candidatedirect. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

candidatedirect.net

candidatedirect.net

109 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

25 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

11 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

17 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

20 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

29 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

35 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

35 ms

SEO Factors

candidatedirect.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Candidatedirect.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Candidatedirect.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

candidatedirect.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Candidatedirect. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: