Tools & Wizards About Us
canterburyonthelake.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

canterburyonthelake.com

Senior Living & Retirement Homes Waterford, MI - Assisted Living & Memory Care

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

783 ms

canterburyonthelake.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Canterburyonthelake content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about canterburyonthelake.com

Canterbury-on-the-Lake welcomes you to enjoy a retirement lifestyle in our senior living & community homes in Waterford, MI. We offer independent living, assisted living, memory care, and more.

Visit canterburyonthelake.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Canterburyonthelake.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

canterburyonthelake.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,420 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.canterburyonthelake.com

1624 ms

css

46 ms

autoptimize_single_b2713d5f216aaf0b582d77a085d5d2ea.css

53 ms

autoptimize_single_36346596dc2ce14970b296c84cf93816.css

74 ms

base.min.css

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Canterburyonthelake.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.userway.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Canterburyonthelake.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 190.0 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Canterburyonthelake.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 636.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 98.2 kB

  • Original 119.6 kB
  • After minification 119.5 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 57.1 kB

  • Original 636.1 kB
  • After minification 579.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Canterburyonthelake images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 34.5 kB

  • Original 487.3 kB
  • After minification 487.3 kB
  • After compression 452.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 215 B

  • Original 58.2 kB
  • After minification 58.2 kB
  • After compression 58.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Canterburyonthelake.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (82%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Canterburyonthelake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.canterburyonthelake.com

www.canterburyonthelake.com

1624 ms

css

css

46 ms

autoptimize_single_b2713d5f216aaf0b582d77a085d5d2ea.css

autoptimize_single_b2713d5f216aaf0b582d77a085d5d2ea.css

53 ms

autoptimize_single_36346596dc2ce14970b296c84cf93816.css

autoptimize_single_36346596dc2ce14970b296c84cf93816.css

74 ms

base.min.css

base.min.css

78 ms

autoptimize_single_f1f55666dae4a0c67ef3a083c715214f.css

autoptimize_single_f1f55666dae4a0c67ef3a083c715214f.css

82 ms

autoptimize_single_b721212ebcfd1c5ad8875b065882dc13.css

autoptimize_single_b721212ebcfd1c5ad8875b065882dc13.css

75 ms

autoptimize_single_d53a8a5bd66f704d86510594874b413d.css

autoptimize_single_d53a8a5bd66f704d86510594874b413d.css

105 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

111 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

97 ms

js

js

57 ms

5d34cceb8997143d8eab15b.js

5d34cceb8997143d8eab15b.js

44 ms

widget.js

widget.js

205 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

78 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

81 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

106 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

122 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

122 ms

autoptimize_single_3d4a5c01a3a4ff86e9229c432987891b.js

autoptimize_single_3d4a5c01a3a4ff86e9229c432987891b.js

122 ms

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

123 ms

autoptimize_single_38073fb3e407b83269b523853332c392.js

autoptimize_single_38073fb3e407b83269b523853332c392.js

124 ms

autoptimize_single_bd97f5b3d310497c8dbcfb1fac8774bb.js

autoptimize_single_bd97f5b3d310497c8dbcfb1fac8774bb.js

123 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

175 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

126 ms

jquery.mask.min.js

jquery.mask.min.js

128 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

137 ms

autoptimize_single_94027c5a70b59785b9fdd8a19073af1e.js

autoptimize_single_94027c5a70b59785b9fdd8a19073af1e.js

136 ms

autoptimize_single_d8367b2a4bcf51276ee9d09668d8240f.js

autoptimize_single_d8367b2a4bcf51276ee9d09668d8240f.js

136 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

150 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

174 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

176 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

175 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

175 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

175 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

176 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

180 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

401 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

401 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

404 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

403 ms

swap.js

swap.js

31 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

402 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

48 ms

hotjar-2288448.js

hotjar-2288448.js

301 ms

talkfurther_init.min.js

talkfurther_init.min.js

225 ms

search.svg

search.svg

223 ms

lk-icon.png

lk-icon.png

224 ms

dotted-divider.png

dotted-divider.png

220 ms

arrow-down.png

arrow-down.png

222 ms

Poppins-Light.woff

Poppins-Light.woff

233 ms

Poppins-Regular.woff

Poppins-Regular.woff

233 ms

Poppins-Bold.woff

Poppins-Bold.woff

293 ms

PTSerif-Web-Regular.woff

PTSerif-Web-Regular.woff

127 ms

PTSerif-Web-BoldItalic.woff

PTSerif-Web-BoldItalic.woff

127 ms

PTSerif-Web-Italic.woff

PTSerif-Web-Italic.woff

126 ms

23-CANB-15170-30th-Anniversary-Logo__RGB.png

23-CANB-15170-30th-Anniversary-Logo__RGB.png

47 ms

hero.jpg

hero.jpg

86 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

74 ms

widget_app_base_1725367019229.js

widget_app_base_1725367019229.js

68 ms

gallery-arrow.png

gallery-arrow.png

69 ms

next.png

next.png

49 ms

Accessibility Review

canterburyonthelake.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

canterburyonthelake.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

canterburyonthelake.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Canterburyonthelake.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Canterburyonthelake.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

canterburyonthelake.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Canterburyonthelake. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: