Report Summary

  • 1

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

capefearsolarsystems.com

Solar Panels For Your Home & Business | Cape Fear Solar Systems - Cape Fear Solar Systems, LLC

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

capefearsolarsystems.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to capefearsolarsystems.com homepage info - get ready to check Cape Fear Solar Systems best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about capefearsolarsystems.com

Solar panels for your home or business.

Visit capefearsolarsystems.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Capefearsolarsystems.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

capefearsolarsystems.com performance score

1

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value34.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value31.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,160 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.702

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value44.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

capefearsolarsystems.com

50 ms

capefearsolarsystems.com

46 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

16 ms

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

27 ms

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 168 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (125 requests) were addressed to the original Capefearsolarsystems.com, 11% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Stella2.demand-iq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 510.5 kB (8%)

Content Size

6.4 MB

After Optimization

5.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Capefearsolarsystems.com main page is 6.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 311.9 kB

  • Original 367.5 kB
  • After minification 352.5 kB
  • After compression 55.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 311.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 4.4 MB
  • After minification 4.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cape Fear Solar Systems images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 909.4 kB
  • After minification 909.4 kB
  • After compression 831.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 119.7 kB

  • Original 756.8 kB
  • After minification 756.7 kB
  • After compression 637.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Capefearsolarsystems.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 119.7 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 102 (70%)

Requests Now

145

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 145 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cape Fear Solar Systems. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 57 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 47 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

capefearsolarsystems.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

capefearsolarsystems.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

capefearsolarsystems.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Capefearsolarsystems.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Capefearsolarsystems.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cape Fear Solar Systems. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: