1.9 sec in total
200 ms
1.3 sec
399 ms
Visit capitaldiscussions.com now to see the best up-to-date Capitaldiscussions content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about capitaldiscussions.com
Investor and Trader discussion, education and financial services
Visit capitaldiscussions.comWe analyzed Capitaldiscussions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
capitaldiscussions.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value4.9 s
66/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.306
38/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
200 ms
16 ms
92 ms
16 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Capitaldiscussions.com, 43% (33 requests) were made to Cdn0.capitaldiscussions.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (288 ms) relates to the external source Secure.livechatinc.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (68%)
1.9 MB
595.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Capitaldiscussions.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 994.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Capitaldiscussions images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 700.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 700.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 524.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Capitaldiscussions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 524.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (69%)
61
19
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Capitaldiscussions. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
capitaldiscussions.com
200 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
16 ms
dynamik-min.css
92 ms
font-awesome.min.css
16 ms
thrive_default.css
112 ms
thrive_colors.css
89 ms
thrive_flat.css
121 ms
frontend.css
106 ms
events.css
102 ms
css
28 ms
two_set.css
125 ms
css
39 ms
font-awesome.css
13 ms
jquery.js
122 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
146 ms
compat.min.js
150 ms
bootstrap-pruned-minified.css
155 ms
cleantalk_nocache.js
148 ms
71b7b5c70337cbd5eae9cef71f0c3a265e078a8e.js
18 ms
jquery.adrotate.clicktracker.js
195 ms
thrive_content_builder_frontend.min.js
195 ms
frontend.min.js
197 ms
comment-reply.min.js
197 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
194 ms
superfish.min.js
198 ms
superfish.args.min.js
198 ms
bootstrap.min.js
10 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
12 ms
wp-embed.min.js
204 ms
fbds.js
160 ms
icon_itunes-30x30.png
141 ms
badge1.png
30 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
counter.js
35 ms
lpt.php
20 ms
capital-discussions-logo-296x76.png
18 ms
Himanshu-Raval-Banner-001-728x90.gif
21 ms
content-filler.png
21 ms
technology-home-bg.jpg
41 ms
choices-750x500-150x150.jpg
23 ms
2016-02-22_nested-iron-condor-150x150.png
22 ms
rsz_sizedollarphotoclub_84937521-150x150.jpg
25 ms
vcard.gif
25 ms
podcast-icon-30x30.png
26 ms
twit_icon.png
35 ms
facebook_icon.png
36 ms
blog_icon.png
37 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
98 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
99 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
119 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
120 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
118 ms
badge1.png
111 ms
t.php
185 ms
tracking.js
112 ms
badge1.png
89 ms
collect
67 ms
268 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
45 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
44 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
45 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
45 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
42 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
42 ms
css
31 ms
bV10rEWSpZ-kJseBDj0BJk2kx1Xybwn4ZI
22 ms
script_data.js
288 ms
icon-plus.png
21 ms
localization.en.0.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d_21613769cb91ff618d0b0b1a827bcb7e.js
58 ms
ping
103 ms
open_chat.cgi
90 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
62 ms
livechat-modern_7cf45543dc.ttf
28 ms
embedded.20160229163048.js
103 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
35 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
28 ms
23 ms
capitaldiscussions.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
capitaldiscussions.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
capitaldiscussions.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Capitaldiscussions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Capitaldiscussions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
capitaldiscussions.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Capitaldiscussions. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: