Tools & Wizards About Us
carbonengineering.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

carbonengineering.com

Carbon Engineering | Direct Air Capture of CO2 | Home

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

95 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

455 ms

carbonengineering.com screenshot

About Website

Visit carbonengineering.com now to see the best up-to-date Carbon Engineering content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about carbonengineering.com

Learn about our groundbreaking carbon removal technology that can be used to create large-scale carbon removal from the atmosphere.

Visit carbonengineering.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Carbonengineering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

carbonengineering.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value960 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

carbonengineering.com

95 ms

carbonengineering.com

528 ms

siteground-optimizer-combined-css-d290f546b2baefa70c99b68da93e7c8c.css

173 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

45 ms

slick.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Carbonengineering.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (528 ms) belongs to the original domain Carbonengineering.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.0 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Carbonengineering.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 57.1 kB

  • Original 74.8 kB
  • After minification 74.6 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Carbon Engineering images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 331.4 kB
  • After minification 331.4 kB
  • After compression 314.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 170.9 kB
  • After minification 170.9 kB
  • After compression 139.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Carbonengineering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (63%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Carbon Engineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

carbonengineering.com

carbonengineering.com

95 ms

carbonengineering.com

carbonengineering.com

528 ms

siteground-optimizer-combined-css-d290f546b2baefa70c99b68da93e7c8c.css

siteground-optimizer-combined-css-d290f546b2baefa70c99b68da93e7c8c.css

173 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

45 ms

slick.css

slick.css

36 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

212 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

132 ms

js

js

75 ms

ticket-details.min.js

ticket-details.min.js

132 ms

rsvp.min.js

rsvp.min.js

133 ms

fitvids.js

fitvids.js

133 ms

mobile-menu.js

mobile-menu.js

237 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

38 ms

slick-load.js

slick-load.js

238 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

40 ms

fancybox.js

fancybox.js

243 ms

contact-form.js

contact-form.js

244 ms

smooth-scroll.polyfills.min.js

smooth-scroll.polyfills.min.js

358 ms

smooth-scroll-load.js

smooth-scroll-load.js

358 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

358 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

359 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

359 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

358 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

373 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

372 ms

api.js

api.js

45 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

372 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

375 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

372 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

380 ms

6516738.js

6516738.js

182 ms

logo-menu.png

logo-menu.png

181 ms

logo.png

logo.png

184 ms

home-new.jpg

home-new.jpg

390 ms

l-nationalgeographic.png

l-nationalgeographic.png

184 ms

l-nytimes.png

l-nytimes.png

184 ms

l-economist.png

l-economist.png

183 ms

l-forbes.png

l-forbes.png

279 ms

bg-block2.jpg

bg-block2.jpg

408 ms

bg-action.jpg

bg-action.jpg

280 ms

logo-footer.png

logo-footer.png

280 ms

background.gif

background.gif

279 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

52 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

66 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

78 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

77 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

78 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

79 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

80 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

172 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

258 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

272 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

272 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

67 ms

Accessibility Review

carbonengineering.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

carbonengineering.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

carbonengineering.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Carbonengineering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Carbonengineering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

carbonengineering.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Carbon Engineering. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: