Tools & Wizards About Us
cardiactesting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

cardiactesting.com

Nuclear Cardiology: Resources and Support for Your Lab | All For One

Page Load Speed

965 ms in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

706 ms

Page Rendered

231 ms

cardiactesting.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cardiactesting.com homepage info - get ready to check Cardiactesting best content right away, or after learning these important things about cardiactesting.com

Find cardiac testing protocols, industry guidelines, shareable resources, and patient care information for healthcare professionals working in nuclear cardiac labs.

Visit cardiactesting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cardiactesting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 937 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cardiactesting.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cardiactesting.com

28 ms

allforonecardiovascular.com

73 ms

gtm.js

306 ms

slick.css

74 ms

slick-theme.css

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cardiactesting.com, 63% (30 requests) were made to Allforonecardiovascular.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (306 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 896.1 kB (13%)

Content Size

7.0 MB

After Optimization

6.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cardiactesting.com main page is 7.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 34.7 kB
  • After minification 28.4 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 775.9 kB

  • Original 6.6 MB
  • After minification 5.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cardiactesting needs image optimization as it can save up to 775.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 42.6 kB

  • Original 236.2 kB
  • After minification 236.2 kB
  • After compression 193.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.6 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 48.5 kB

  • Original 101.6 kB
  • After minification 101.6 kB
  • After compression 53.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cardiactesting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 48% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (43%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cardiactesting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cardiactesting.com

cardiactesting.com

28 ms

allforonecardiovascular.com

allforonecardiovascular.com

73 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

306 ms

slick.css

slick.css

74 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

78 ms

mapsvg.css

mapsvg.css

45 ms

nanoscroller.css

nanoscroller.css

65 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

73 ms

css

css

87 ms

site.css

site.css

90 ms

jquery-3.4.0.min.js

jquery-3.4.0.min.js

64 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

132 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

66 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

68 ms

main.bundle.js

main.bundle.js

68 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

82 ms

jquery.nanoscroller.min.js

jquery.nanoscroller.min.js

74 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

73 ms

mapsvg.js

mapsvg.js

126 ms

logo--all-for-one.png

logo--all-for-one.png

125 ms

hero--home--5--mobile@2x.png

hero--home--5--mobile@2x.png

128 ms

patient-home-icon-3-x.png

patient-home-icon-3-x.png

81 ms

hcp-home-icon-3-x.png

hcp-home-icon-3-x.png

126 ms

patient-centered-home-icon-3-x.png

patient-centered-home-icon-3-x.png

125 ms

hero--home--2--mobile@2x.png

hero--home--2--mobile@2x.png

178 ms

hero--home--3--mobile@2x.png

hero--home--3--mobile@2x.png

183 ms

hero--home--1--mobile@2x.png

hero--home--1--mobile@2x.png

181 ms

patient-resource-hero-mobile--2x.png

patient-resource-hero-mobile--2x.png

179 ms

icon--back-to-top@2x.png

icon--back-to-top@2x.png

125 ms

logo--astellas--white.png

logo--astellas--white.png

178 ms

arrow--down--red.png

arrow--down--red.png

64 ms

hero--home--5.png

hero--home--5.png

178 ms

hero--home--2.png

hero--home--2.png

175 ms

hero--home--3.png

hero--home--3.png

174 ms

hero--home--1.png

hero--home--1.png

172 ms

patient-resource-hero-image@desktop2x.png

patient-resource-hero-image@desktop2x.png

179 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

49 ms

arrow--left--red.png

arrow--left--red.png

87 ms

arrow--right--red.png

arrow--right--red.png

88 ms

font

font

87 ms

LeagueGothic-Regular.woff

LeagueGothic-Regular.woff

45 ms

slick.woff

slick.woff

45 ms

js

js

89 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

60 ms

hotjar-1671106.js

hotjar-1671106.js

136 ms

surveys.js

surveys.js

115 ms

vmeat4w5k.js

vmeat4w5k.js

75 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

Accessibility Review

cardiactesting.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cardiactesting.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cardiactesting.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cardiactesting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cardiactesting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cardiactesting.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cardiactesting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: