6.4 sec in total
281 ms
5.5 sec
661 ms
Click here to check amazing Cardscout content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cardscout.de
Das unabhängige Kreditkarten-Portal cardscout vergleicht für Sie mehr als 100 Kreditkarten ➞ Finden Sie jetzt die beste Kreditkarte und beantragen Sie direkt beim Anbieter! ✓ von Experten geprüft ✓ sc...
Visit cardscout.deWe analyzed Cardscout.de page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
cardscout.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value810 ms
36/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
281 ms
2332 ms
329 ms
242 ms
651 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Cardscout.de, 11% (10 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net and 11% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cardscout.de.
Page size can be reduced by 508.7 kB (53%)
960.0 kB
451.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Cardscout.de main page is 960.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 556.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cardscout images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 376.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 376.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cardscout.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (49%)
87
44
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cardscout. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
cardscout.de
281 ms
www.cardscout.de
2332 ms
all.regular.css
329 ms
253464651.js
242 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
651 ms
main.regular.js
433 ms
redirection-mobile.js
385 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
82 ms
spcjs.php
571 ms
spc.php
433 ms
fl.js
326 ms
focus_logo.gif
114 ms
067d44edb0db5bab01ab24040857a51998c671c1.png
397 ms
524396147dbfd977c8682e3c25b930fbf8cbf7b6.png
395 ms
9eefb03d695c3e4224f62da9b5aaf6f4fc42717f.png
394 ms
9d52806a8eb4ce9596de44b04de5c9f1bbf8d933.png
395 ms
D69TQpywDCcGJR6xOSDdQj3tMU_MvlAnxtub2Dnt8CY.jpg
516 ms
-3485-oM1xBrGdPC0lU5VN3maE4oyUuKKrLyhsvc_eU.jpg
517 ms
iDG7pnKCacWl1ODRmm5n-gMzTKzFTakD3ZLqtyLdwaI.jpg
753 ms
vqDcFC-nnBGk3ps_wBm8lLaxpjCbZwAC7bJIxT5BSCM.jpg
857 ms
Qo-nQbmAvFb6lg68Ry0-hXm5jkLnEZwhXeMPxlkS50o.jpg
830 ms
ad-small-02.gif
751 ms
gtm.js
69 ms
bg-header.png
855 ms
bg-header-holder.png
854 ms
bg-header-frame.jpg
1071 ms
logo.png
1073 ms
bg-search.png
1150 ms
bg-nav.png
1176 ms
futura.woff
1274 ms
lg.php
390 ms
lg.php
374 ms
bg-comparison.png
1581 ms
sprite.png
1504 ms
arrows.png
1396 ms
btn-big.png
1450 ms
likebox.php
114 ms
lg.php
428 ms
bg-sidebar-box.gif
1465 ms
bg-gray-box.png
1572 ms
bg-text-field.png
1703 ms
lg.php
456 ms
show_ads.js
40 ms
ag.php
420 ms
lg.php
455 ms
gtm.js
51 ms
ca-pub-1550893728751279.js
9 ms
zrt_lookup.html
33 ms
show_ads_impl.js
66 ms
FbUd6dZS1Af.css
156 ms
dGJLq38YL-C.css
173 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
212 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
255 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
209 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
229 ms
gtm.js
64 ms
hotjar-125446.js
196 ms
analytics.js
140 ms
ads
343 ms
osd.js
38 ms
linkid.js
11 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
137 ms
modules-1f5c71aea63f8df71401422ed80fbe5f.js
47 ms
11695819_1033637939993431_127256113030831664_n.jpg
93 ms
11846780_1044851882205370_3140949535914123487_n.jpg
92 ms
581909_122921508086500_879547551289966453_n.jpg
93 ms
10354686_10150004552801856_220367501106153455_n.jpg
93 ms
226761_107593502662809_772744_n.jpg
92 ms
12122703_1053159374761267_4179804469681160944_n.jpg
90 ms
946165_938839029527421_3452712103394809380_n.jpg
93 ms
12360018_1072310789446104_2381165889214868012_n.jpg
94 ms
969112_170233359811544_1479043479_n.jpg
95 ms
576882_398258813578772_659249121_n.jpg
108 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
82 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
82 ms
bg-footer.png
1292 ms
bg-footer-holder.jpg
1436 ms
logo_sprite.png
1456 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
21 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
36 ms
m_js_controller.js
30 ms
abg.js
42 ms
favicon
76 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
75 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
20 ms
s
10 ms
x_button_blue2.png
17 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
6 ms
visit-data
212 ms
cardscout.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cardscout.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
cardscout.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cardscout.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cardscout.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cardscout.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cardscout. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: