2.6 sec in total
247 ms
2 sec
376 ms
Click here to check amazing Caregiving content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about caregiving.com
We at Caregiving.com are here to care for you as you care for family and friends. Explore our articles written for family caregivers by family caregivers.
Visit caregiving.comWe analyzed Caregiving.com page load time and found that the first response time was 247 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
caregiving.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
15/100
10%
Value1,060 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
14/100
10%
247 ms
61 ms
23 ms
43 ms
13 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Caregiving.com, 48% (29 requests) were made to Cg-css.tadpubco.netdna-cdn.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to New-cdn-b-flyzoocorporatio.netdna-ssl.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (602 ms) relates to the external source Widget.flyzoo.co.
Page size can be reduced by 230.5 kB (39%)
588.0 kB
357.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Caregiving.com main page is 588.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 255.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Caregiving needs image optimization as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 91.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.7 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 974 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Caregiving.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 974 B or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (84%)
51
8
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Caregiving. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.caregiving.com
247 ms
css
61 ms
415aeb727a122a11332c507ae7659e6e.css
23 ms
4392265b9c8c5f436b450225f7374168.css
43 ms
faa967ef304ac3bc2d13fa183056bbd1.css
13 ms
de8e836bca50a0e34c0d2768f9efab3b.css
19 ms
20941b51c87e6cee6d559bb0acaddeb8.css
19 ms
28fe9a66d119d6fec9aa9579476a1efb.css
31 ms
aa3b455638b1bc31713de99b2459f0be.css
44 ms
f8e7808a60efd5c6f491cb289ef80cee.css
26 ms
d7e4939e4fd5ed97275ce327656f0a4c.css
25 ms
85d695f568f7ac34c7dc08745db0e8de.css
40 ms
8dd9deead6c0943ac4571ee7c09b150d.css
45 ms
ecwid-chameleon.js
59 ms
5a7980640f8a49cafc93bd9162534548.js
46 ms
eb5e780e2ddae118432d56f36c3bd3a1.js
41 ms
5f04ad7968bba9e6ce3b17eb34ced789.js
44 ms
550f5b3cffc84d2b7039dbcce861d7ef.js
43 ms
80cec9cb482ae2b2b501b7ce70479c61.js
42 ms
00b284d5b1cd4de3c36354357ded1278.js
141 ms
widget-groups.min.js
146 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
152 ms
fe4836d0b19b9100ea6595634300f725.js
141 ms
a47e9c731b5d2a5c5da196b3ac9bf0dc.js
141 ms
ecwid-chameleon.js
162 ms
8d360595793555fac10b446ab04b9fcd.js
144 ms
9bf64b46b48208470750ec60ca6f18e5.js
144 ms
3127907bef81b114081669674b0eb002.js
143 ms
20cc07f7834d22d7df22c0e27128aeef.js
143 ms
ce1ab9f2dd5b8e4af711252ee453decb.js
140 ms
6cc53bd6ec0c7204a142ef4ff64fa5ca.js
143 ms
widgets.js
582 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
108 ms
logo_2-e1441938631142.png
240 ms
flyzoo.start.js
602 ms
analytics.js
496 ms
Virtual-Caregiving-Conference.jpg
449 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
436 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
437 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
479 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
479 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
478 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
316 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
314 ms
collect
25 ms
flyzoo.embedded.css
6 ms
flyzoo.v2.0.0.js
48 ms
css
15 ms
dock
211 ms
fonts.css
4 ms
flyzoo.dock.css
5 ms
jquery.min.js
82 ms
jquery.signalR-2.2.0.min.js
13 ms
fastclick.js
13 ms
flyzoo.dock.bundle.v2.js
14 ms
APH4jr0uSos5wiut5cpjronF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
10 ms
flyzoowidget.svg
2 ms
analytics.js
27 ms
collect
27 ms
lazyload.1.0.2.min.js
3 ms
caregiving.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
caregiving.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
caregiving.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Caregiving.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Caregiving.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
caregiving.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Caregiving. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: