Tools & Wizards About Us
carepital.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

carepital.com

Carepital - To inspire and empower

Page Load Speed

25 sec in total

First Response

3.9 sec

Resources Loaded

10.6 sec

Page Rendered

10.4 sec

carepital.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to carepital.com homepage info - get ready to check Carepital best content right away, or after learning these important things about carepital.com

by Charlie Chan Turning over every stone on trading & investment as I seek to discover life. Collating ideas and resources that saves you days, months and years of experimentations. - Carepital

Visit carepital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Carepital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.9 sec and then it took 21.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

carepital.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20,610 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.062

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.carepital.com

3908 ms

autoptimize_ded9a077dcb6843dec83a5be9695b31a.css

831 ms

autoptimize_342a90be09c6018355e148ae7cde99bc.css

523 ms

js

187 ms

dashicons.min.css

346 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Carepital.com, 11% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Witty-innovator-3306.ck.page. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Carepital.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 836.7 kB (82%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

189.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Carepital.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 684.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 259.0 kB

  • Original 296.0 kB
  • After minification 295.9 kB
  • After compression 37.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 259.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 83 B
  • After minification 83 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Carepital images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 46.4 kB
  • After minification 46.4 kB
  • After compression 37.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 18% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 569.3 kB

  • Original 684.1 kB
  • After minification 163.6 kB
  • After compression 114.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Carepital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 569.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (83%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Carepital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.carepital.com

www.carepital.com

3908 ms

autoptimize_ded9a077dcb6843dec83a5be9695b31a.css

autoptimize_ded9a077dcb6843dec83a5be9695b31a.css

831 ms

autoptimize_342a90be09c6018355e148ae7cde99bc.css

autoptimize_342a90be09c6018355e148ae7cde99bc.css

523 ms

js

js

187 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

346 ms

autoptimize_single_869841ed03607bc77ef6d627b0ba16eb.css

autoptimize_single_869841ed03607bc77ef6d627b0ba16eb.css

343 ms

autoptimize_single_2bcdb1fbc1802484bb8e3ae2f575cf93.css

autoptimize_single_2bcdb1fbc1802484bb8e3ae2f575cf93.css

341 ms

autoptimize_single_35bde7cbc515cdae802289943245f622.css

autoptimize_single_35bde7cbc515cdae802289943245f622.css

367 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2271 ms

index.js

index.js

294 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

684 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

692 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

695 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

2419 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

2485 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

2484 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

2485 ms

e-202242.js

e-202242.js

217 ms

js

js

215 ms

autoptimize_fa224639368c1eb63eda283e8458a3fb.js

autoptimize_fa224639368c1eb63eda283e8458a3fb.js

2485 ms

adminbar-background.png

adminbar-background.png

662 ms

search.svg

search.svg

396 ms

bb-icons.woff

bb-icons.woff

558 ms

ck.5.js

ck.5.js

897 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

530 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

528 ms

js

js

499 ms

Accessibility Review

carepital.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

carepital.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

carepital.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Carepital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Carepital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

carepital.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Carepital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: