Tools & Wizards About Us
caretaker.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

caretaker.org

WELCOME PAGE - The Caretaker Gazette - #1 Source for Caretaker Opportunities since 1983!

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

96 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

240 ms

caretaker.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Caretaker content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about caretaker.org

WANT TO LIVE RENT-FREE - anywhere in the world? There are empty homes in every state and country, and property owners are looking for trustworthy people to live in them as property caretakers and hous...

Visit caretaker.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Caretaker.org page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

caretaker.org performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

75/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,580 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.573

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

caretaker.org

96 ms

main.php

187 ms

looking_advertise.gif

205 ms

embed.js

134 ms

like.php

218 ms

Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Caretaker.org, 41% (49 requests) were made to Static.cdninstagram.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Caretaker.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 102.1 kB (13%)

Content Size

770.3 kB

After Optimization

668.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Caretaker.org main page is 770.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 440.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 42.4 kB

  • Original 56.5 kB
  • After minification 50.4 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 440.8 kB
  • After minification 430.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Caretaker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 49.0 kB

  • Original 214.4 kB
  • After minification 210.6 kB
  • After compression 165.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 58.6 kB
  • After minification 58.6 kB
  • After compression 58.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Caretaker.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (61%)

Requests Now

116

After Optimization

45

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 116 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Caretaker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

caretaker.org

caretaker.org

96 ms

main.php

main.php

187 ms

looking_advertise.gif

looking_advertise.gif

205 ms

embed.js

embed.js

134 ms

like.php

like.php

218 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

97 ms

t_mini-a.png

t_mini-a.png

56 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

34 ms

verification_seal.gif

verification_seal.gif

194 ms

login_spacer.gif

login_spacer.gif

94 ms

login_curve.png

login_curve.png

118 ms

login_right.png

login_right.png

122 ms

login_left.png

login_left.png

120 ms

login_submit.png

login_submit.png

121 ms

login_username.png

login_username.png

120 ms

login_password.png

login_password.png

193 ms

R1A.png

R1A.png

223 ms

nav_home.png

nav_home.png

232 ms

nav_sample_listings.png

nav_sample_listings.png

229 ms

nav_subscribe.png

nav_subscribe.png

233 ms

nav_advertise.png

nav_advertise.png

223 ms

nav_about.png

nav_about.png

584 ms

nav_profile.png

nav_profile.png

618 ms

nav_reviews.png

nav_reviews.png

618 ms

nav_links.png

nav_links.png

624 ms

nav_contact.png

nav_contact.png

624 ms

R2B6.jpg

R2B6.jpg

758 ms

R2C.png

R2C.png

996 ms

R3B.png

R3B.png

997 ms

R3D.png

R3D.png

1061 ms

TheCaretakerGazette.jpg

TheCaretakerGazette.jpg

1147 ms

cover_side.jpg

cover_side.jpg

1144 ms

hawthornebanner_small.jpg

hawthornebanner_small.jpg

1178 ms

housestaff_ad2.png

housestaff_ad2.png

1201 ms

gray_dot.gif

gray_dot.gif

1209 ms

horizontal_solution_PPeCheck.gif

horizontal_solution_PPeCheck.gif

34 ms

reviews.html

reviews.html

120 ms

testimonials.html

testimonials.html

126 ms

hRjXtjJFPAo

hRjXtjJFPAo

112 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

37 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

74 ms

434 ms

settings

settings

397 ms

TttXWwYVW0v.js

TttXWwYVW0v.js

54 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

45 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

15 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

44 ms

base.js

base.js

73 ms

review1-125x125.png

review1-125x125.png

359 ms

review2-125x125.png

review2-125x125.png

526 ms

review3-125x125.png

review3-125x125.png

532 ms

review4-125x125.png

review4-125x125.png

532 ms

review5-125x125.png

review5-125x125.png

532 ms

review8-125x125.png

review8-125x125.png

540 ms

review9-125x125.png

review9-125x125.png

773 ms

review10-125x125.png

review10-125x125.png

920 ms

success1-125x125.jpg

success1-125x125.jpg

913 ms

success2-125x125.jpg

success2-125x125.jpg

912 ms

success3-125x125.jpg

success3-125x125.jpg

912 ms

success4.jpg

success4.jpg

967 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

186 ms

LvMrC3vzHFP8SzxjvqNWRksbkOPiJTf11ILX4Pq8Ybc.js

LvMrC3vzHFP8SzxjvqNWRksbkOPiJTf11ILX4Pq8Ybc.js

135 ms

embed.js

embed.js

54 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

52 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

63 ms

HWZ7TKGvJQP.css

HWZ7TKGvJQP.css

52 ms

yz4fzCOJvuF.css

yz4fzCOJvuF.css

166 ms

YwQdCotexSx.css

YwQdCotexSx.css

188 ms

FYpxsFy1DgS.css

FYpxsFy1DgS.css

184 ms

rMKsJ4mTa69.css

rMKsJ4mTa69.css

181 ms

NEv5OeoQeDg.css

NEv5OeoQeDg.css

181 ms

SHojUHmeyWm.js

SHojUHmeyWm.js

224 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

44 ms

Create

Create

232 ms

embeds

embeds

218 ms

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

211 ms

id

id

105 ms

wFyxcb5a_CA.png

wFyxcb5a_CA.png

151 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

117 ms

VjAs0Xdy_RE.js

VjAs0Xdy_RE.js

118 ms

f6KaEh61WWT.js

f6KaEh61WWT.js

117 ms

sejb8Xlqh4C.js

sejb8Xlqh4C.js

125 ms

oNTNBe5bTAQ.js

oNTNBe5bTAQ.js

118 ms

uxCgKtj0hr3.js

uxCgKtj0hr3.js

123 ms

iqfdoYyqQ9O.js

iqfdoYyqQ9O.js

126 ms

t1rKC1fVSR_.js

t1rKC1fVSR_.js

125 ms

0IwHhvbGqSB.js

0IwHhvbGqSB.js

127 ms

u6TjsOboy56.js

u6TjsOboy56.js

127 ms

cEM8HumdxpH.js

cEM8HumdxpH.js

127 ms

-Pv1lZYOeeI.js

-Pv1lZYOeeI.js

128 ms

QgimtsGiQBH.js

QgimtsGiQBH.js

128 ms

QUxbiIFOEqH.js

QUxbiIFOEqH.js

151 ms

0yactC7tM6g.js

0yactC7tM6g.js

151 ms

oTfO5Z4us6k.js

oTfO5Z4us6k.js

150 ms

jVvSDzaDazm.js

jVvSDzaDazm.js

150 ms

FkQZD1KYfTb.js

FkQZD1KYfTb.js

151 ms

SKdtG5PJSFi.js

SKdtG5PJSFi.js

154 ms

n4kXIBnAgIz.js

n4kXIBnAgIz.js

154 ms

zEdPrLwV9mm.js

zEdPrLwV9mm.js

151 ms

LKe0QsbLPt9.js

LKe0QsbLPt9.js

151 ms

_6Q4vhqJy4r.js

_6Q4vhqJy4r.js

156 ms

u2fMxEgAiq1.js

u2fMxEgAiq1.js

153 ms

yT01VTZcHQ8.js

yT01VTZcHQ8.js

155 ms

pJfT2TK7Rrj.js

pJfT2TK7Rrj.js

153 ms

J1VbMx8qJ8X.js

J1VbMx8qJ8X.js

154 ms

wVwiWkGNqwG.js

wVwiWkGNqwG.js

155 ms

-7gfuo3bx25.js

-7gfuo3bx25.js

156 ms

FeYbAhiQLN7.js

FeYbAhiQLN7.js

158 ms

wxzPW5ru5wM.js

wxzPW5ru5wM.js

155 ms

GIlJjyzEguQ.js

GIlJjyzEguQ.js

156 ms

5-CNhD1hzUM.js

5-CNhD1hzUM.js

157 ms

HDiX03ZTkcn.js

HDiX03ZTkcn.js

158 ms

ieEpjC_gTvk.js

ieEpjC_gTvk.js

162 ms

zx0veXl93dr.js

zx0veXl93dr.js

49 ms

d4BDatS3XIp.js

d4BDatS3XIp.js

47 ms

JaMJqU2pGNO.js

JaMJqU2pGNO.js

47 ms

izc1ABDFhxb.js

izc1ABDFhxb.js

50 ms

IbEU6o3x0eh.js

IbEU6o3x0eh.js

45 ms

KyCDJh5Z2FZ.js

KyCDJh5Z2FZ.js

43 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

144 ms

Accessibility Review

caretaker.org accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

caretaker.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

caretaker.org SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Caretaker.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Caretaker.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

caretaker.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Caretaker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: