Tools & Wizards About Us
cargotrack.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

cargotrack.net

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

306 ms

Resources Loaded

609 ms

Page Rendered

131 ms

cargotrack.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cargotrack.net homepage info - get ready to check Cargotrack best content for Panama right away, or after learning these important things about cargotrack.net

Visit cargotrack.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Cargotrack.net page load time and found that the first response time was 306 ms and then it took 740 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cargotrack.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

cargotrack.net

306 ms

ga.js

28 ms

control.css

185 ms

ct_logo.jpg

262 ms

__utm.gif

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Cargotrack.net, 18% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 18% (2 requests) were made to Verify.authorize.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (306 ms) belongs to the original domain Cargotrack.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.6 kB (27%)

Content Size

156.1 kB

After Optimization

114.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cargotrack.net main page is 156.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 111.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 11.2 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 20.6 kB

  • Original 111.5 kB
  • After minification 90.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cargotrack needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 61 B

  • Original 18.2 kB
  • After minification 18.2 kB
  • After compression 18.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 15.2 kB
  • After minification 12.1 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cargotrack.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cargotrack. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

cargotrack.net

cargotrack.net

306 ms

ga.js

ga.js

28 ms

control.css

control.css

185 ms

ct_logo.jpg

ct_logo.jpg

262 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

environment.gif

environment.gif

81 ms

about.gif

about.gif

101 ms

seal.js

seal.js

40 ms

skypeme_btn_small_green.gif

skypeme_btn_small_green.gif

72 ms

secure90x72.gif

secure90x72.gif

8 ms

CTWebBG3.jpg

CTWebBG3.jpg

192 ms

SEO Factors

cargotrack.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cargotrack.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cargotrack.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

cargotrack.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cargotrack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: