6.1 sec in total
1.7 sec
4.3 sec
108 ms
Click here to check amazing Carma content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about carma.social
Get professional help with your marketing so you can spend more time on what matters - running your business!
Visit carma.socialWe analyzed Carma.social page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
carma.social performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.3 s
0/100
10%
Value26.7 s
0/100
25%
Value21.2 s
0/100
10%
Value1,250 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.113
86/100
15%
Value27.6 s
0/100
10%
1654 ms
35 ms
645 ms
327 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Carma.social, 5% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Carma.social.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (71%)
2.3 MB
672.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Carma.social main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Carma needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 44% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 723.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 723.6 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 821.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Carma.social needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 821.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (92%)
53
4
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Carma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
carma.social
1654 ms
api.js
35 ms
style.min.css
645 ms
grid-style2.css
327 ms
recaptcha__en.js
54 ms
styles.css
205 ms
style.css
278 ms
font-awesome.min.css
338 ms
import-eventbrite-events.css
420 ms
grid-style2.css
319 ms
rs6.css
543 ms
style.css
668 ms
style.css
439 ms
font-libre-franklin.css
470 ms
style.css
546 ms
blocks.css
577 ms
js_composer.min.css
995 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
602 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
655 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
738 ms
hooks.min.js
688 ms
jquery.min.js
828 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
774 ms
script.js
797 ms
rbtools.min.js
1069 ms
rs6.min.js
1188 ms
global.js
889 ms
navigation.js
911 ms
wpm-public.p1.min.js
1088 ms
js
67 ms
css
40 ms
prettyPhoto.min.css
1031 ms
owl.min.css
1032 ms
animate.min.css
1086 ms
i18n.min.js
1110 ms
index.js
1123 ms
index.js
1159 ms
hash-link-scroll-offset.min.js
1244 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
1313 ms
api.js
35 ms
index.js
1312 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1250 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
1180 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1141 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1069 ms
underscore.min.js
1158 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1140 ms
vc_grid.min.js
1057 ms
css
20 ms
fbevents.js
148 ms
cropped-cropped-Carma-Chameleon-1.png
277 ms
dummy.png
274 ms
openbridge3.js
126 ms
424457794345366
234 ms
font
231 ms
libre-franklin-all-400-normal.woff
232 ms
libre-franklin-all-300-normal.woff
233 ms
libre-franklin-all-600-normal.woff
234 ms
libre-franklin-all-800-normal.woff
231 ms
carma.social accessibility score
carma.social best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
carma.social SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Carma.social can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Carma.social main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
carma.social
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Carma. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: