Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

carpeaqua.com

carpeaqua

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

185 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.8 sec

carpeaqua.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to carpeaqua.com homepage info - get ready to check Carpeaqua best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about carpeaqua.com

Justin Williams has the hottest takes.

Visit carpeaqua.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Carpeaqua.com page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

carpeaqua.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

carpeaqua.com

185 ms

carpeaqua.com

415 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

twentysixteen.css

208 ms

css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Carpeaqua.com, 22% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source I1.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 316.3 kB (43%)

Content Size

727.1 kB

After Optimization

410.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Carpeaqua.com main page is 727.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 293.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 50.5 kB

  • Original 69.6 kB
  • After minification 67.8 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 340 B

  • Original 293.1 kB
  • After minification 292.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Carpeaqua images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 125.1 kB

  • Original 183.5 kB
  • After minification 179.8 kB
  • After compression 58.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.1 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 140.4 kB

  • Original 181.0 kB
  • After minification 161.4 kB
  • After compression 40.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Carpeaqua.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 140.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (64%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Carpeaqua. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

carpeaqua.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

carpeaqua.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

carpeaqua.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Carpeaqua.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Carpeaqua.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Carpeaqua. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: