Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

carrier.de

Alle Produkte | Carrier Klimatechnik, Kältetechnik, Transicold & Marine

Page Load Speed

998 ms in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

735 ms

Page Rendered

203 ms

carrier.de screenshot

About Website

Visit carrier.de now to see the best up-to-date Carrier content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about carrier.de

Übersicht Carrier Schwesterfirmen: Carrier Klimatechnik, Carrier Kältetechnik, Carrier Transicold & Carrier Marine

Visit carrier.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Carrier.de page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 938 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

carrier.de performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value640 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.235

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

carrier.de

60 ms

alle-produkte

244 ms

app.min.css

69 ms

global.min.css

57 ms

style.min.css

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Carrier.de, 39% (7 requests) were made to Carrier.com and 33% (6 requests) were made to Images.carriercms.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (257 ms) relates to the external source Images.carriercms.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.6 kB (6%)

Content Size

316.2 kB

After Optimization

297.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Carrier.de main page is 316.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 153.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 23.7 kB
  • After minification 22.6 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 230 B

  • Original 153.1 kB
  • After minification 152.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Carrier images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 89.1 kB
  • After minification 89.1 kB
  • After compression 89.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 50.3 kB
  • After minification 50.3 kB
  • After compression 50.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Carrier.de has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (25%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Carrier. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

carrier.de accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

carrier.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

carrier.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Carrier.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Carrier.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Carrier. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: