3.5 sec in total
230 ms
2.8 sec
508 ms
Visit cartour.org now to see the best up-to-date Cartour content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cartour.org
Collegamenti giornalieri con Villa San Giovanni, Napoli, Salerno, Ustica, Pantelleria, isole Eolie, Egadi e Pelagie. Prenota ora il tuo viaggio in traghetto!
Visit cartour.orgWe analyzed Cartour.org page load time and found that the first response time was 230 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
cartour.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value990 ms
28/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
230 ms
195 ms
121 ms
122 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cartour.org, 88% (67 requests) were made to Static.carontetourist.it and 4% (3 requests) were made to Carontetourist.it. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) relates to the external source Static.carontetourist.it.
Page size can be reduced by 187.5 kB (12%)
1.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Cartour.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 915.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.4 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 103.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cartour needs image optimization as it can save up to 103.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cartour.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (49%)
70
36
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cartour. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cartour.org
230 ms
en
195 ms
css_RCMtPKn1oaOE5WCP8-VR0FWo5Om3bpJPjGbM9VpkeGM.css
121 ms
css_U0IrsIWCoGqW3mGlnkMj7puRh84nH89pjtMgcmaiM28.css
122 ms
css_Mu7-jmCeBF_HpIoHj3UeLouU0BElB4aOTLy30mm08-I.css
123 ms
css_jSFDObEAOe90mMaLsCCYnCVYFkX_kUXeLrJj9lGh9eQ.css
134 ms
jquery.min.js
45 ms
jquery-extend-3.4.0.js
38 ms
jquery-html-prefilter-3.5.0-backport.js
38 ms
jquery.once.js
44 ms
drupal.js
44 ms
jquery_browser.js
44 ms
lazysizes.min.js
45 ms
jquery.cookie.js
127 ms
entityreference.js
127 ms
video.js
127 ms
js
139 ms
markermanager_packed.js
209 ms
bootstrap.min.js
803 ms
picturefill.min.js
126 ms
picture.min.js
132 ms
carontetourist.it.min.js
135 ms
auth.min.js
135 ms
user.min.js
135 ms
booking.min.js
136 ms
find-destination.min.js
137 ms
destinations.min.js
148 ms
gtm.js
162 ms
close.svg
177 ms
blank.png
226 ms
group.svg
30 ms
arrow-fff.svg
29 ms
curva.svg
27 ms
partenza.svg
28 ms
arrow-down.svg
26 ms
destinazione.svg
36 ms
pattern.png
34 ms
group.jpg
76 ms
CS-w.svg
35 ms
ora-icon.svg
36 ms
partenza-icon.svg
33 ms
arrivo-icon.svg
71 ms
arrow-right.svg
76 ms
nave-icon.svg
75 ms
SI-w.svg
72 ms
ferma-a.svg
77 ms
ct-logo.svg
81 ms
isoleminori-siremar-grey.svg
82 ms
ml-logo.svg
85 ms
blank.png
78 ms
ico-play.svg
79 ms
topdiario_greenpass_0.png
93 ms
diario.png
89 ms
ct-col-logo.svg
90 ms
montserrat-regular-webfont.woff
90 ms
gru-link-frex-txt.svg
90 ms
thumbnail_700x450-greenpass.jpg
91 ms
diario-700x450-covid-caronte_0.jpg
89 ms
back_numeri.jpg
98 ms
ico-passa.png
88 ms
ico-auto.png
83 ms
ico-corse.png
84 ms
ico-opinione-conta.svg
85 ms
ico-reclami.svg
90 ms
ico-info.svg
85 ms
ico-whistblowing.svg
79 ms
group-payoff-white.svg
86 ms
caronte-payoff-white.svg
88 ms
siremar-payoff-white.svg
79 ms
fre-right.svg
84 ms
markermanager_packed.js
64 ms
montserrat-bold-webfont.woff
36 ms
montserrat-semibold-webfont.woff
35 ms
group.jpg
959 ms
isoleminori-siremar.svg
3 ms
ml-col-logo.svg
6 ms
cartour.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
cartour.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
cartour.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cartour.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cartour.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cartour.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cartour. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: