3.5 sec in total
172 ms
2.8 sec
525 ms
Welcome to carveph.com homepage info - get ready to check Carveph best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about carveph.com
At CARVE, we consider ourselves to be “progressionists.” We are a team of Virtual Assistants and Project Managers whose entire focus is on how to support your business growth in the fastest and most s...
Visit carveph.comWe analyzed Carveph.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
carveph.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value3.0 s
96/100
10%
172 ms
1111 ms
26 ms
109 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Carveph.com, 67% (45 requests) were made to Carve.ph and 24% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Carve.ph.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (48%)
5.1 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Carveph.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 434.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Carveph needs image optimization as it can save up to 434.8 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 870.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 870.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Carveph.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (83%)
48
8
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Carveph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
carveph.com
172 ms
carve.ph
1111 ms
css
26 ms
prettyPhoto.css
109 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
74 ms
front.css
73 ms
layerslider.css
110 ms
css
53 ms
page-list.css
74 ms
style.css
109 ms
font-awesome.min.css
144 ms
style.min.css
147 ms
stylesheet.min.css
396 ms
webkit_stylesheet.css
139 ms
safari_stylesheet.css
140 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
175 ms
style_dynamic.php
766 ms
responsive.min.css
215 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.php
743 ms
js_composer.css
397 ms
custom_css.php
802 ms
jquery.js
319 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
394 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
435 ms
video-lightbox.js
436 ms
greensock.js
438 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
439 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
438 ms
site_tracking.js
340 ms
qode-like.min.js
369 ms
plugins.js
479 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
382 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
405 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
421 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
441 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
459 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
479 ms
js
81 ms
default_dynamic.php
1093 ms
default.min.js
526 ms
custom_js.php
1112 ms
comment-reply.min.js
562 ms
js_composer_front.js
600 ms
analytics.js
179 ms
Logo4Ady1.png
170 ms
Logo4Ady.png
171 ms
Logo4Ady2.png
170 ms
Logo4Ady-2.png
173 ms
IMG_0256.jpg
438 ms
ZKwULyCG95tk6mOqHQfRBMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
41 ms
cbAbzEjxTdN5KKmS-gA0tcDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
40 ms
rr0ijB5_2nAJsAoZ6vECXSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
43 ms
HwcR1xy4rp5CQGMY8FhsNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
40 ms
Li18TEFObx_yGdzKDoI_csDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
40 ms
STBOO2waD2LpX45SXYjQBcDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
42 ms
WmVKXVcOuffP_qmCpFuyzcDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
42 ms
QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBcDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
42 ms
Ji5epXNcpHu3r63lhS0cTsDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
43 ms
TVSB8ogXDKMcnAAJ5CqrUo3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
42 ms
7dO2Hj7qB8nRVFK0svQqRiZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
47 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-ho3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
43 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzI3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
43 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSo3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
45 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
45 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTY3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
45 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
205 ms
collect
20 ms
carveph.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
carveph.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
carveph.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Carveph.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Carveph.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
carveph.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Carveph. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: