Tools & Wizards About Us
casecoach.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

casecoach.com

The number-one consulting interview prep platform | CaseCoach

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

267 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

626 ms

casecoach.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Case Coach content for Azerbaijan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about casecoach.com

Get ready to join top firms like McKinsey, BCG and Bain with the world’s #1 case interview prep platform. Online courses, practice tools & private coaching.

Visit casecoach.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Casecoach.com page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

casecoach.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,550 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.104

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

casecoach.com

267 ms

casecoach.com

892 ms

js

133 ms

styles.css

38 ms

menu-image.css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Casecoach.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Sibforms.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (892 ms) belongs to the original domain Casecoach.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 104.3 kB (23%)

Content Size

448.0 kB

After Optimization

343.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Casecoach.com main page is 448.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 209.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 94.5 kB

  • Original 114.2 kB
  • After minification 94.8 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 209.2 kB
  • After minification 209.2 kB
  • After compression 208.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 124.6 kB
  • After minification 124.4 kB
  • After compression 116.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Casecoach.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (75%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Case Coach. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

casecoach.com

casecoach.com

267 ms

casecoach.com

casecoach.com

892 ms

js

js

133 ms

styles.css

styles.css

38 ms

menu-image.css

menu-image.css

30 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

49 ms

style.css

style.css

39 ms

slick.css

slick.css

34 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

44 ms

styles-motionkata-theme.css

styles-motionkata-theme.css

94 ms

styles-custom.css

styles-custom.css

86 ms

styles-new.css

styles-new.css

57 ms

styles-blog-new.css

styles-blog-new.css

48 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

96 ms

popupaoc-public.css

popupaoc-public.css

107 ms

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

100 ms

image-lazy-loading.js

image-lazy-loading.js

102 ms

sib-styles.css

sib-styles.css

94 ms

main.js

main.js

198 ms

api.js

api.js

98 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

101 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

101 ms

index.js

index.js

193 ms

popupaoc-public.js

popupaoc-public.js

194 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

238 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

236 ms

lazy-loading.js

lazy-loading.js

238 ms

functions-2.0.js

functions-2.0.js

236 ms

requests.js

requests.js

239 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

311 ms

mn2tdae81j

mn2tdae81j

227 ms

Logo_new.svg

Logo_new.svg

169 ms

HomePageNew2024.webp

HomePageNew2024.webp

165 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

162 ms

bulletpoint.svg

bulletpoint.svg

160 ms

candidate_success_right.svg

candidate_success_right.svg

163 ms

cta-img-bg.svg

cta-img-bg.svg

166 ms

cta-img-sm.svg

cta-img-sm.svg

170 ms

footer-logo.svg

footer-logo.svg

173 ms

Accessibility Review

casecoach.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

casecoach.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

casecoach.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Casecoach.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Casecoach.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

casecoach.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Case Coach. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: