Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

casepillar.com

Case Study Solution and Analysis | University Case Study Help

Page Load Speed

10.6 sec in total

First Response

2.5 sec

Resources Loaded

7.9 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

casepillar.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to casepillar.com homepage info - get ready to check Case Pillar best content right away, or after learning these important things about casepillar.com

No time to fix case research studies? Here are skilled authors to assist you finish a case study rapidly.

Visit casepillar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Casepillar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 8.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

casepillar.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,170 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

casepillar.com

2450 ms

init.js

157 ms

bdt-uikit.css

238 ms

ep-helper.css

258 ms

vfb-style.min.css

242 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Casepillar.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Static.getbutton.io and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Casepillar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 144.1 kB (22%)

Content Size

665.8 kB

After Optimization

521.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Casepillar.com main page is 665.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 311.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 129.0 kB

  • Original 158.1 kB
  • After minification 148.6 kB
  • After compression 29.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 47.8 kB
  • After minification 42.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Case Pillar needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 272 B

  • Original 311.9 kB
  • After minification 311.9 kB
  • After compression 311.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 148.0 kB
  • After minification 146.0 kB
  • After compression 138.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Casepillar.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (77%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Case Pillar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

casepillar.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

casepillar.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

casepillar.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Casepillar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Casepillar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Case Pillar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: