Tools & Wizards About Us
casespec.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

casespec.net

DocSheets AI: Revolutionizing Application Lifecycle and Project Requirements Management"

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

366 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

615 ms

casespec.net screenshot

About Website

Visit casespec.net now to see the best up-to-date Casespec content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about casespec.net

Discover DocSheets AI, the ultimate tool for Enterprise Lifecycle and Project Requirements Management. Combining the simplicity of a spreadsheet with the power of AI, DocSheets AI offers a comprehensi...

Visit casespec.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Casespec.net page load time and found that the first response time was 366 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

casespec.net performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.docsheets.com

366 ms

css

44 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

11 ms

styles.css

21 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Casespec.net, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (471 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.0 kB (42%)

Content Size

284.4 kB

After Optimization

164.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Casespec.net main page is 284.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 143.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 103.1 kB

  • Original 128.1 kB
  • After minification 125.7 kB
  • After compression 25.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 143.4 kB
  • After minification 126.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Casespec needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 45 B

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (84%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Casespec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.docsheets.com

www.docsheets.com

366 ms

css

css

44 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

11 ms

styles.css

styles.css

21 ms

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css

22 ms

dflip.min.css

dflip.min.css

32 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

44 ms

default.css

default.css

30 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

35 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

33 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

28 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

47 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

51 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

48 ms

post-13359.css

post-13359.css

48 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

57 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

54 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

54 ms

style-static.min.css

style-static.min.css

78 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

76 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

54 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

73 ms

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

72 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

74 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

74 ms

counter.js

counter.js

38 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

74 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

168 ms

sa-owl-theme.css

sa-owl-theme.css

169 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

173 ms

lightgallery.css

lightgallery.css

172 ms

lightgallery-bundle.min.css

lightgallery-bundle.min.css

170 ms

table-of-content.min.css

table-of-content.min.css

176 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

174 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

175 ms

index.js

index.js

194 ms

index.js

index.js

194 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

194 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

198 ms

dflip.min.js

dflip.min.js

226 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

186 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

233 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

177 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

176 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

174 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

211 ms

easypiechart.js

easypiechart.js

211 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

204 ms

common.js

common.js

202 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

202 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

200 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

199 ms

owl.carousel2.thumbs.min.js

owl.carousel2.thumbs.min.js

197 ms

lightgallery.min.js

lightgallery.min.js

198 ms

lg-video.min.js

lg-video.min.js

179 ms

lg-zoom.min.js

lg-zoom.min.js

180 ms

lg-autoplay.min.js

lg-autoplay.min.js

179 ms

player.min.js

player.min.js

180 ms

table-of-content.min.js

table-of-content.min.js

178 ms

motion-effects.js

motion-effects.js

179 ms

sticky-elements.js

sticky-elements.js

178 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

87 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

87 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

86 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

85 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

83 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

82 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

82 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

82 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

129 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

268 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

398 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

416 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

417 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

471 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

127 ms

t.php

t.php

407 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

173 ms

logo-main.png

logo-main.png

171 ms

tracebility.png

tracebility.png

256 ms

ezgif.com-gif-maker-1-scaled.webp

ezgif.com-gif-maker-1-scaled.webp

257 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA3q5d0.ttf

240 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA3q5d0.ttf

292 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWyWtFCc.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWyWtFCc.ttf

240 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA3q5d0.ttf

290 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-vNiXg7Q.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-vNiXg7Q.ttf

293 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

236 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

239 ms

imgpsh_fullsize_anim-1-300x287.jpg

imgpsh_fullsize_anim-1-300x287.jpg

35 ms

requirements-traceability-tool.webp

requirements-traceability-tool.webp

35 ms

doc-slide-1.webp

doc-slide-1.webp

33 ms

doc-slide-2.webp

doc-slide-2.webp

33 ms

doc-slide-3.webp

doc-slide-3.webp

36 ms

doc-slide-4.webp

doc-slide-4.webp

79 ms

doc-slide-5.webp

doc-slide-5.webp

80 ms

Accessibility Review

casespec.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

casespec.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

casespec.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Casespec.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Casespec.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

casespec.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Casespec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: