Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

cashback.us

CASHBACK.US

Page Load Speed

547 ms in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

439 ms

Page Rendered

94 ms

cashback.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing CASHBACK content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cashback.us

Forsale Lander

Visit cashback.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Cashback.us page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 533 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cashback.us performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,220 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cashback.us

14 ms

CASHBACK.US

186 ms

uxcore2.min.css

49 ms

no-header.css

57 ms

e0d8ccbdc480b0de.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cashback.us, 62% (16 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 27% (7 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (188 ms) relates to the external source Afternic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.6 kB (40%)

Content Size

462.9 kB

After Optimization

277.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Cashback.us main page is 462.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 256.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 128.6 kB

  • Original 178.8 kB
  • After minification 178.7 kB
  • After compression 50.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CASHBACK images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 57.0 kB

  • Original 256.9 kB
  • After minification 256.4 kB
  • After compression 199.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 53 B

  • Original 24.7 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB
  • After compression 24.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cashback.us has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (88%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CASHBACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

cashback.us accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

cashback.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cashback.us SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cashback.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cashback.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CASHBACK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: