547 ms in total
14 ms
439 ms
94 ms
Click here to check amazing CASHBACK content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cashback.us
Forsale Lander
Visit cashback.usWe analyzed Cashback.us page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 533 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
cashback.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value3.3 s
68/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value2,220 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value13.0 s
13/100
10%
14 ms
186 ms
49 ms
57 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Cashback.us, 62% (16 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 27% (7 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (188 ms) relates to the external source Afternic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 185.6 kB (40%)
462.9 kB
277.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Cashback.us main page is 462.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 256.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CASHBACK images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 57.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.0 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cashback.us has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (88%)
24
3
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CASHBACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cashback.us
14 ms
CASHBACK.US
186 ms
uxcore2.min.css
49 ms
no-header.css
57 ms
e0d8ccbdc480b0de.css
29 ms
22719d8efa8c5312.css
133 ms
756d51243b27bdd0.css
47 ms
polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js
104 ms
webpack-e20feefe05c4aa4b.js
38 ms
framework-dbea89470bd6302a.js
117 ms
main-74e713d3b47a5490.js
46 ms
_app-32fe43674229c321.js
93 ms
901-8f842f4738474c1b.js
94 ms
712-e581e0784fc4e8a6.js
102 ms
188-9a0e9dafb2837219.js
112 ms
%5Bdomain%5D-2efbeb8bbf63198e.js
109 ms
_buildManifest.js
118 ms
_ssgManifest.js
188 ms
heartbeat.js
52 ms
uxcore2.min.js
52 ms
vendor.min.js
57 ms
scc-afternic-c1.min.js
58 ms
no-header.js
57 ms
esw.min.js
56 ms
aksb.min.js
57 ms
image
47 ms
cashback.us accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
cashback.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
cashback.us SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cashback.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cashback.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cashback.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CASHBACK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: