2.2 sec in total
82 ms
1.8 sec
381 ms
Click here to check amazing Casjam content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about casjam.com
Brian Casel’s personal site where thousands receive his newsletter and content about entrepreneurship, designing products for the web.
Visit casjam.comWe analyzed Casjam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
casjam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value3.1 s
75/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
82 ms
72 ms
61 ms
54 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Casjam.com, 13% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 6% (5 requests) were made to Static-1.gumroad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (74%)
3.6 MB
930.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Casjam.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Casjam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 942.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Casjam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 942.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (83%)
70
12
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Casjam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
casjam.com
82 ms
bootstrap.min.css
72 ms
animations.css
61 ms
font-awesome.min.css
54 ms
custom.css
62 ms
responsive.css
69 ms
style.css
76 ms
lqr2zsm.js
172 ms
gumroad.js
105 ms
public-main.css
80 ms
light_hc.css
81 ms
default-styles.css
80 ms
custom.modernizr.js
85 ms
jquery.min.js
112 ms
tweet-this-box.js
80 ms
bootstrap.min.js
82 ms
waypoints.min.js
101 ms
waypoints-sticky.min.js
103 ms
jquery.stellar.js
102 ms
masonry.min.js
103 ms
custom.js
108 ms
wp-embed.min.js
105 ms
oct.js
10 ms
casjam.com
191 ms
gumroad-overlay-70ff2a66d89f2a3434d169b884a285f03f2378f039b3cb3a1bee411240e7fc1e.js
30 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
117 ms
css
23 ms
ga.js
71 ms
brian-casel-bg.jpg
170 ms
brian-casel-sm.png
166 ms
footer-mixergy.png
65 ms
footer-entrepreneur.png
66 ms
footer-mashable.png
66 ms
1290644.js
26 ms
count.js
125 ms
iHt976bGps6gtXVk6ANMsY7RPnPi5KJvPLceckHDaSGffV1mggMdeMJ6Mk6f5Mw.woff
95 ms
dcHhyjbqM-QO3Lc-Ydvh0FClvnHaZ3jEzoRYzjCK62jffHhpEN32IgCjMKM2HMJtgM.woff
98 ms
EUHLxW7jVLRRa2JqrLYtz_j6lq3NmESZtBTR9izV-y3ffVamggMdeMJ6Mk6f5Mj.woff
276 ms
_x0fs548nUZQ3W96vBupfvnDxHkFgs10I-zY38fw3sJffOfpEN32IgCjMKM2HMJtg3.woff
317 ms
lxgImtGlC-cYA5wF0CtNQARLD_ZFRlAslxRCLCceFQCffJYAggMdeMJ6Mk6f5M6.woff
330 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
275 ms
mixpanel-2-latest.min.js
92 ms
fbevents.js
91 ms
5422b9a17ab7f099e6000017.js
270 ms
adsct
292 ms
adsct
90 ms
yYN0ctyaABeDzcAzE7Hse054Wa4UPq_seMearbZUGtIffVnmggMdeMJ6Mk6f5MX.woff
204 ms
syOf4Np9yoU3PGKag4I3ojV-nWlMHMCjXczla1MXiIqffHEpEN32IgCjMKM2HMJt26.woff
204 ms
NHFKU8pCw9p95Imdp1oDovRvxBW1gs8hpVr3gncfKxXffV_mggMdeMJ6Mk6f5gM.woff
211 ms
xTDmZjgWL0BXWFYLpUuriGrC9t8S60GFi_pHfJyCl2qffHrpEN32IgCjMKM2HMJtIb.woff
235 ms
inpage_linkid.js
80 ms
visit
138 ms
visit
132 ms
76 ms
81 ms
91 ms
p.gif
193 ms
__utm.gif
35 ms
tagjs
50 ms
68 ms
adsct
63 ms
pixel
76 ms
Pug
83 ms
cb
27 ms
sd
17 ms
tap.php
23 ms
cb
4 ms
ncm
5 ms
cb
4 ms
overlay_page
80 ms
application-29f35f3093c29a77409db5148aba12919d4a621c6ae0203f83fa8eaf7e9e7bc8.css
64 ms
extended_bundle-1ba82474e3e443c6779f9ca12656786ccf12ffaf15bacba1de038a078f3969d3.js
43 ms
overlay-f80a324ac11da1e9121d91bae544090463515997c9a0f31945afbad59ba8eb61.js
50 ms
59 ms
analytics.js
126 ms
header_bar-bd3be3db872f96368507899b9f29f6e4acdd64c84dfc132c2f7366924c900b52.png
80 ms
braintree.js
88 ms
braintree-data.js
76 ms
checkout.js
165 ms
channel.html
19 ms
collect
27 ms
collect
82 ms
casjam.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
casjam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
casjam.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Casjam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Casjam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
casjam.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Casjam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: