4 sec in total
646 ms
3 sec
359 ms
Welcome to castingx.com homepage info - get ready to check Castingx best content right away, or after learning these important things about castingx.com
Visit castingx.comWe analyzed Castingx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 646 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
castingx.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value0
0/100
10%
Value0
0/100
30%
Value0.131
81/100
15%
Value0
0/100
10%
646 ms
149 ms
24 ms
224 ms
220 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Castingx.com, 50% (20 requests) were made to Media.castingx.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Media.castingx.com.
Page size can be reduced by 151.0 kB (6%)
2.6 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Castingx.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Castingx images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 28.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.4 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Castingx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (11%)
38
34
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Castingx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
castingx.com
646 ms
castingx.css
149 ms
jquery.min.js
24 ms
jPages.js
224 ms
castingx.js
220 ms
lazyLoad.js
277 ms
ga.js
6 ms
bg_web_castingx.jpg
925 ms
bg_nav.png
139 ms
logo_castingx_web.png
189 ms
bg_opaque.png
123 ms
loader.gif
215 ms
apple--touch-icon1.png
234 ms
apple--touch-duo.png
248 ms
apple--touch-filmx.png
265 ms
plus.png
291 ms
__utm.gif
70 ms
DSCF0056.JPG
733 ms
bg_web_photo.jpg
733 ms
bg_photo.png
263 ms
Girl40.jpg
716 ms
DSCF0458.JPG
725 ms
DSCF0302.JPG
641 ms
DSCF0236.JPG
971 ms
bonvenocf-light-webfont.woff
341 ms
vignette_suzanna.jpg
1870 ms
DSCF0040.JPG
625 ms
DSCF0009.JPG
699 ms
DSCF0001.JPG
707 ms
DSCF0729.JPG
708 ms
DSCF0317.JPG
718 ms
Girl46.jpg
787 ms
Girl50-1.jpg
790 ms
Girl35.jpg
796 ms
DSCF0560.JPG
812 ms
Girl26.jpg
877 ms
Girl28.jpg
879 ms
Girl51.jpg
887 ms
Girl33.jpg
903 ms
DSCF0036.JPG
952 ms
castingx.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
castingx.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Castingx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Castingx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
castingx.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Castingx. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: