315 ms in total
90 ms
172 ms
53 ms
Visit catastrophemap.org now to see the best up-to-date Catastrophemap content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about catastrophemap.org
Visit catastrophemap.orgWe analyzed Catastrophemap.org page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 225 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
catastrophemap.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
90 ms
83 ms
Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Catastrophemap.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (90 ms) belongs to the original domain Catastrophemap.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 kB (9%)
13.1 kB
11.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Catastrophemap.org main page is 13.1 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 993 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 993 B or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 239 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Catastrophemap images are well optimized though.
We found no issues to fix!
0
0
Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.
catastrophemap.org
90 ms
catastrophemap.org
83 ms
catastrophemap.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
catastrophemap.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
catastrophemap.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
GB2312
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Catastrophemap.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Catastrophemap.org main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
catastrophemap.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Catastrophemap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: