Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

catchcover.com

Ice Fishing & Ice House Accessories: Catch Cover

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

101 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

463 ms

catchcover.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Catch Cover content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about catchcover.com

The Original Catch Cover Makes Ice Fishing Easier Than Ever. Keep Your Ice House Warm, Clean, and Dry.

Visit catchcover.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Catchcover.com page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

catchcover.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,670 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.134

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.4 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

catchcover.com

101 ms

catchcover.com

1145 ms

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

562 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

174 ms

webfont.js

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Catchcover.com, 39% (24 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Catchcover.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 149.4 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

918.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Catchcover.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 512.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 132.4 kB

  • Original 152.7 kB
  • After minification 135.3 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 512.4 kB
  • After minification 512.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Catch Cover images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 395.5 kB
  • After minification 395.5 kB
  • After compression 378.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 62 B

  • Original 7.0 kB
  • After minification 7.0 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Catchcover.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (52%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Catch Cover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

catchcover.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

catchcover.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

catchcover.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Catchcover.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Catchcover.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Catch Cover. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: