Tools & Wizards About Us
catterickbridge.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

catterickbridge.co.uk

Catterick Racecourse | Horse Racing | North Yorkshire

Page Load Speed

21.4 sec in total

First Response

308 ms

Resources Loaded

20.9 sec

Page Rendered

248 ms

catterickbridge.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Catterick Bridge content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about catterickbridge.co.uk

A day at the races is a wonderful occasion and provides an excellent way to entertain clients, staff, family or friends.

Visit catterickbridge.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Catterickbridge.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 21.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

catterickbridge.co.uk performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,160 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.132

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

catterickbridge.co.uk

308 ms

catterickbridge.co.uk

416 ms

gtm.js

56 ms

css

188 ms

js

365 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Catterickbridge.co.uk, 11% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Static.tacdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.7 sec) relates to the external source Rs.gwallet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 166.3 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Catterickbridge.co.uk main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 45.9 kB

  • Original 56.8 kB
  • After minification 41.5 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.3 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 32.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Catterick Bridge images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 31.1 kB

  • Original 237.1 kB
  • After minification 237.1 kB
  • After compression 205.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-96%

Potential reduce by 56.3 kB

  • Original 58.5 kB
  • After minification 2.2 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Catterickbridge.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.3 kB or 96% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (50%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Catterick Bridge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

catterickbridge.co.uk

catterickbridge.co.uk

308 ms

catterickbridge.co.uk

catterickbridge.co.uk

416 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

56 ms

css

css

188 ms

js

js

365 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

339 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

431 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

343 ms

js

js

356 ms

js

js

522 ms

wejs

wejs

38 ms

dc.js

dc.js

21 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

35 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

78 ms

tchotel_2023_LL.png

tchotel_2023_LL.png

33 ms

logo.png

logo.png

104 ms

Hospitality.jpg

Hospitality.jpg

274 ms

Catterick_720x475-min.jpg

Catterick_720x475-min.jpg

189 ms

under-18.png

under-18.png

105 ms

qa-logo.png

qa-logo.png

134 ms

1024.png

1024.png

208 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

47 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

77 ms

Homepage%20Banner%20Image%20(6).png

Homepage%20Banner%20Image%20(6).png

548 ms

Homepage%20Banner%20Image%20(4)-min.jpg

Homepage%20Banner%20Image%20(4)-min.jpg

408 ms

js

js

56 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

279 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

284 ms

x50130r659104130

x50130r659104130

19651 ms

WidgetEmbed-certificateOfExcellence

WidgetEmbed-certificateOfExcellence

73 ms

bx_loader-ca9d6f.gif

bx_loader-ca9d6f.gif

90 ms

t4b_widget_coe-v2381509749a.css

t4b_widget_coe-v2381509749a.css

3 ms

cdswidgets_min-c-v2395114504a.js

cdswidgets_min-c-v2395114504a.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

catterickbridge.co.uk accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

catterickbridge.co.uk best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

catterickbridge.co.uk SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Catterickbridge.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Catterickbridge.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

catterickbridge.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Catterick Bridge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: