Tools & Wizards About Us
ce-check.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

ce-check.eu

Product Compliance & Regulatory Blog | Clever Compliance

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

204 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

718 ms

ce-check.eu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ce-check.eu homepage info - get ready to check Ce Check best content right away, or after learning these important things about ce-check.eu

The Clever Compliance blog - A blog about product compliance, certification, and product markings. Read here our latest posts.

Visit ce-check.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Ce-check.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ce-check.eu performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ce-check.eu

204 ms

ce-check.eu

680 ms

script.js

49 ms

style.min.css

368 ms

blossomthemes-toolkit-public.min.css

360 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Ce-check.eu, 66% (25 requests) were made to Blog.clevercompliance.io and 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) relates to the external source Blog.clevercompliance.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

885.3 kB

After Optimization

704.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ce-check.eu main page is 885.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 579.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 170.0 kB

  • Original 192.5 kB
  • After minification 187.5 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 50.7 kB
  • After minification 44.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ce Check needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 579.0 kB
  • After minification 579.0 kB
  • After compression 575.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 265 B

  • Original 63.2 kB
  • After minification 63.2 kB
  • After compression 62.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ce-check.eu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (86%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ce Check. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ce-check.eu

ce-check.eu

204 ms

ce-check.eu

ce-check.eu

680 ms

script.js

script.js

49 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

368 ms

blossomthemes-toolkit-public.min.css

blossomthemes-toolkit-public.min.css

360 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

360 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

378 ms

perfect-scrollbar.min.css

perfect-scrollbar.min.css

370 ms

css

css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

528 ms

gutenberg.min.css

gutenberg.min.css

620 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

702 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

631 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

5 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

2355 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

1262 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

2271 ms

blossomthemes-toolkit-public.min.js

blossomthemes-toolkit-public.min.js

3268 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

3659 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

3278 ms

19553337.js

19553337.js

246 ms

layzr.min.js

layzr.min.js

3681 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

4427 ms

perfect-scrollbar.min.js

perfect-scrollbar.min.js

4282 ms

owlcarousel2-a11ylayer.min.js

owlcarousel2-a11ylayer.min.js

4286 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

4287 ms

ajax.min.js

ajax.min.js

4286 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

4287 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

66 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

4466 ms

cc-logo-pos.png

cc-logo-pos.png

3819 ms

font

font

20 ms

19553337.js

19553337.js

150 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

152 ms

fb.js

fb.js

47 ms

banner.js

banner.js

151 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

128 ms

dashboard-595x400.jpg

dashboard-595x400.jpg

611 ms

Accessibility Review

ce-check.eu accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

ce-check.eu best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ce-check.eu SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ce-check.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ce-check.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ce-check.eu

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ce Check. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: