Tools & Wizards About Us
ce-marking.help screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

ce-marking.help

CE Marking assistant, your declarations of conformity online

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

476 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

714 ms

ce-marking.help screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing CE Marking content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ce-marking.help

The "EU Declaration of conformity" web application helps the manufacturers, the importers, consultants and the notified bodies to keep under control the EU Declaration of conformity related to CE MARK...

Visit ce-marking.help

Key Findings

We analyzed Ce-marking.help page load time and found that the first response time was 476 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ce-marking.help performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value980 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ce-marking.help

476 ms

home

700 ms

bootstrap.min.css

53 ms

font-awesome.min.css

65 ms

font-lato.css

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Ce-marking.help, 70% (38 requests) were made to Da4284glbbt4.cloudfront.net and 7% (4 requests) were made to Customer.celab.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (700 ms) belongs to the original domain Ce-marking.help.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 404.0 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ce-marking.help main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 382.8 kB

  • Original 411.5 kB
  • After minification 252.0 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 159.4 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 382.8 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CE Marking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 32 B

  • Original 8.7 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 79.6 kB
  • After minification 79.6 kB
  • After compression 77.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ce-marking.help has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (52%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CE Marking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ce-marking.help

ce-marking.help

476 ms

home

home

700 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

53 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

65 ms

font-lato.css

font-lato.css

64 ms

app.css

app.css

73 ms

cookie_banner.css

cookie_banner.css

68 ms

jquery.filer.css

jquery.filer.css

68 ms

jquery.filer-dragdropbox-theme.css

jquery.filer-dragdropbox-theme.css

70 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

75 ms

adminlte.min.css

adminlte.min.css

82 ms

css

css

103 ms

project.css

project.css

74 ms

helpers.css

helpers.css

80 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

77 ms

welcome.css

welcome.css

90 ms

search_engine.css

search_engine.css

90 ms

default.css

default.css

88 ms

component.css

component.css

93 ms

logo_small.png

logo_small.png

88 ms

logo_ce-marking_90x16_white.png

logo_ce-marking_90x16_white.png

91 ms

logo_do160_90x16.png

logo_do160_90x16.png

88 ms

logo_riskanalysis_90x16.png

logo_riskanalysis_90x16.png

90 ms

donate.png

donate.png

88 ms

header.png

header.png

93 ms

logo_new.png

logo_new.png

92 ms

directive.png

directive.png

91 ms

jquery-filer.css

jquery-filer.css

36 ms

css

css

26 ms

laptop.png

laptop.png

42 ms

list

list

542 ms

new

new

663 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

40 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

41 ms

site.jpg

site.jpg

39 ms

European-Law.jpg

European-Law.jpg

38 ms

texture.png

texture.png

25 ms

machinery-regulation.jpg

machinery-regulation.jpg

63 ms

document.png

document.png

62 ms

recreational-craft_book.jpg

recreational-craft_book.jpg

17 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

167 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

28 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

66 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf

96 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

303 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

274 ms

logo.png

logo.png

6 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

6 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

12 ms

main.js

main.js

10 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

42 ms

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317

78 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

ce_directives.js

ce_directives.js

4 ms

Accessibility Review

ce-marking.help accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ce-marking.help best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ce-marking.help SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ce-marking.help can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ce-marking.help main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ce-marking.help

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of CE Marking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: