4.6 sec in total
1.6 sec
2.6 sec
364 ms
Visit cedarcreek.tv now to see the best up-to-date Cedar Creek content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cedarcreek.tv
We are a Christian church with six locations in Northwest Ohio. We warmly welcome people of all backgrounds, whether they’re following Jesus or still exploring their faith.
Visit cedarcreek.tvWe analyzed Cedarcreek.tv page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
cedarcreek.tv performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value6,430 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value20.9 s
2/100
10%
1629 ms
79 ms
131 ms
54 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Cedarcreek.tv, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Go.mediasocial.tv. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Cedarcreek.tv.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (75%)
3.0 MB
744.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Cedarcreek.tv main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 920.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cedar Creek needs image optimization as it can save up to 920.4 kB or 66% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cedarcreek.tv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (61%)
71
28
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedar Creek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
cedarcreek.tv
1629 ms
style.css
79 ms
player.js
131 ms
wp-fb-grabber.css
54 ms
jshowoff.css
55 ms
bootstrap_tab.min.css
57 ms
bootstrap_dropdown.min.css
57 ms
res_tab_icon.css
55 ms
prettyPhoto.css
104 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
82 ms
light_style.css
83 ms
mappress.css
84 ms
public-main.css
83 ms
blue_n_gold.css
101 ms
calendar.css
103 ms
HkMuob.css
107 ms
jquery.js
202 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
107 ms
jquery.jshowoff.js
127 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
151 ms
video-lightbox.js
124 ms
tweet-this-box.js
128 ms
cgm_events_calendar_cal_js.js
124 ms
external-tracking.min.js
145 ms
HkMuob.js
140 ms
comment-reply.min.js
144 ms
collapse.js
184 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
183 ms
bootstrap-dropdown.js
181 ms
bootstrap-tab.js
183 ms
bootstrap-tabdrop.js
183 ms
wp-embed.min.js
209 ms
global.css
155 ms
layout.css
156 ms
univers.css
156 ms
print.css
157 ms
mobile.css
179 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
122 ms
css
23 ms
bg_repeating.png
108 ms
ga.js
60 ms
bg.jpg
113 ms
logo.png
39 ms
facebook.png
39 ms
twitter.png
40 ms
btn_search.png
41 ms
nav_bg.jpg
41 ms
sidebar_bg.png
108 ms
SplashSlide-2.jpg
407 ms
CelebrationPlaceSlide.jpg
220 ms
ShortTermGroups.jpg
283 ms
mission2.jpg
283 ms
btn_imnewhere.png
127 ms
btn_upcomingevents.png
129 ms
fb_logo_small.png
133 ms
SplashSlide-2-80x40.jpg
216 ms
CelebrationPlaceSlide-80x40.jpg
216 ms
ShortTermGroups-80x40.jpg
218 ms
mission2-80x40.jpg
216 ms
mediaplayer.gif
274 ms
evite.gif
274 ms
current_series.jpg
394 ms
CountdownEmbed
78 ms
features_footer_bg.png
257 ms
features_footer_flag.png
257 ms
univers.woff
314 ms
__utm.gif
42 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
128 ms
js
122 ms
mscorlib.js
404 ms
PJS.MS.Channel2.js
177 ms
GlobalOptions.ashx
27 ms
reftagger.js
457 ms
cedarcreek.tv accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
cedarcreek.tv best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
cedarcreek.tv SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedarcreek.tv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedarcreek.tv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cedarcreek.tv
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cedar Creek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: