Tools & Wizards About Us
cedarcreekfences.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

cedarcreekfences.com

One moment, please...

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

929 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

694 ms

cedarcreekfences.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cedarcreekfences.com homepage info - get ready to check Cedarcreekfences best content right away, or after learning these important things about cedarcreekfences.com

Cedar Creek Fences specializes in a wide variety of fence styles, gate designs, decorative trims & more. Contact us today to get started with a FREE estimate!

Visit cedarcreekfences.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cedarcreekfences.com page load time and found that the first response time was 929 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cedarcreekfences.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cedarcreekfences.com

929 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

40 ms

style.min.css

76 ms

classic-themes.min.css

92 ms

style.min.css

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Cedarcreekfences.com, 14% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (929 ms) belongs to the original domain Cedarcreekfences.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 169.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cedarcreekfences.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 103.7 kB

  • Original 122.2 kB
  • After minification 114.0 kB
  • After compression 18.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cedarcreekfences images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 16.7 kB

  • Original 264.0 kB
  • After minification 264.0 kB
  • After compression 247.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 32.2 kB

  • Original 162.9 kB
  • After minification 162.6 kB
  • After compression 130.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cedarcreekfences.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.2 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (86%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedarcreekfences. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cedarcreekfences.com

cedarcreekfences.com

929 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

40 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

76 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

92 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

129 ms

style.css

style.css

97 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

96 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

121 ms

post-139.css

post-139.css

107 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

139 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

145 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

146 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

147 ms

hamburgers.min.css

hamburgers.min.css

155 ms

slider.css

slider.css

155 ms

css

css

60 ms

css

css

58 ms

css

css

58 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

152 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

161 ms

post-649.css

post-649.css

161 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

176 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

189 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

185 ms

post-25.css

post-25.css

187 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

194 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

192 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

207 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

213 ms

css

css

56 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

239 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

220 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

221 ms

js

js

113 ms

post-355.css

post-355.css

220 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

347 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

346 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

356 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

357 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

357 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

358 ms

ad346e902a.js

ad346e902a.js

76 ms

mailchimp.min.js

mailchimp.min.js

355 ms

social.min.js

social.min.js

328 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

290 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

279 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

273 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

272 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

262 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

242 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

227 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

226 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

224 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

222 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

224 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

216 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

214 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

226 ms

logo-test.png

logo-test.png

306 ms

25.jpg

25.jpg

359 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

399 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

306 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

356 ms

logo-bbb1.png

logo-bbb1.png

249 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

166 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

167 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf

221 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

233 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

235 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf

235 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

232 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

284 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

272 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

272 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

284 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

315 ms

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasasatSyqwQ.ttf

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasasatSyqwQ.ttf

234 ms

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasc8btSyqwQ.ttf

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasc8btSyqwQ.ttf

235 ms

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasfcZtSyqwQ.ttf

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasfcZtSyqwQ.ttf

234 ms

neIQzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeauXQ-pQ.ttf

neIQzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeauXQ-pQ.ttf

235 ms

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasd8ctSyqwQ.ttf

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasd8ctSyqwQ.ttf

236 ms

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasbsftSyqwQ.ttf

neIXzD-0qpwxpaWvjeD0X88SAOeasbsftSyqwQ.ttf

236 ms

o.jpg

o.jpg

150 ms

Accessibility Review

cedarcreekfences.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cedarcreekfences.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cedarcreekfences.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedarcreekfences.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedarcreekfences.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cedarcreekfences.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cedarcreekfences. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: