Tools & Wizards About Us
cedarhillpointe.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

cedarhillpointe.com

Home - Cedar Hill Pointe

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

35 ms

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

cedarhillpointe.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cedarhillpointe.com homepage info - get ready to check Cedar Hill Pointe best content right away, or after learning these important things about cedarhillpointe.com

Centrally located off Hwy 67 and Pleasant Run Road, Cedar Hill Pointe offers a selection of well-known retail options that are suitable for the whole family.

Visit cedarhillpointe.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cedarhillpointe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cedarhillpointe.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cedarhillpointe.com

35 ms

www.cedarhillpointe.com

2019 ms

js

82 ms

gtm.js

197 ms

cv.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Cedarhillpointe.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Cedarhillpointe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 622.8 kB (20%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cedarhillpointe.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 100.7 kB

  • Original 121.9 kB
  • After minification 117.9 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 150.0 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cedar Hill Pointe images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 231.7 kB

  • Original 811.7 kB
  • After minification 811.2 kB
  • After compression 580.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 231.7 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 140.4 kB

  • Original 400.7 kB
  • After minification 400.1 kB
  • After compression 260.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cedarhillpointe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 140.4 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (76%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedar Hill Pointe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cedarhillpointe.com

cedarhillpointe.com

35 ms

www.cedarhillpointe.com

www.cedarhillpointe.com

2019 ms

js

js

82 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

197 ms

cv.css

cv.css

31 ms

cvpro.min.css

cvpro.min.css

37 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

35 ms

88180fc.css

88180fc.css

45 ms

d4e955f.css

d4e955f.css

41 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

39 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

64 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

51 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

57 ms

all.css

all.css

59 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

107 ms

post-13.css

post-13.css

68 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

137 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

184 ms

global.css

global.css

189 ms

post-27.css

post-27.css

134 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

180 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

191 ms

post-4360.css

post-4360.css

233 ms

post-4377.css

post-4377.css

232 ms

css

css

47 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

238 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

238 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

253 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

253 ms

language-cookie.js

language-cookie.js

252 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

252 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

269 ms

css

css

63 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

293 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

291 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

306 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

309 ms

common-vendors.css

common-vendors.css

304 ms

common.css

common.css

305 ms

feed.css

feed.css

322 ms

front-app.css

front-app.css

315 ms

cv.js

cv.js

402 ms

cvpro.min.js

cvpro.min.js

382 ms

wc-quick-view.js

wc-quick-view.js

376 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

377 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

461 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

437 ms

url-polyfill.min.js

url-polyfill.min.js

462 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

450 ms

object-fit.min.js

object-fit.min.js

443 ms

runtime.js

runtime.js

469 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

496 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

497 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

450 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

434 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

420 ms

common-vendors.js

common-vendors.js

426 ms

common.js

common.js

433 ms

feed.js

feed.js

428 ms

front-app.js

front-app.js

406 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

387 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

396 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

395 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

379 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

379 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

377 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

385 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

373 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

366 ms

font

font

182 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

365 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

350 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

339 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

350 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

340 ms

estados-unidos.png

estados-unidos.png

340 ms

mexico.png

mexico.png

341 ms

embed

embed

475 ms

HOME-1-1.jpg

HOME-1-1.jpg

408 ms

font

font

107 ms

font

font

138 ms

font

font

124 ms

font

font

166 ms

font

font

137 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

380 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

402 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

375 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

285 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

312 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

315 ms

jupiterx.woff

jupiterx.woff

305 ms

Marcos_Pizza_Logo.png

Marcos_Pizza_Logo.png

328 ms

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS_LOGO.png

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS_LOGO.png

334 ms

DELUXE-NAIL-SALON_LOGO.png

DELUXE-NAIL-SALON_LOGO.png

306 ms

Asurion_Tech_Logo.jpg

Asurion_Tech_Logo.jpg

284 ms

Gigis-Cupcakes_logo.jpg

Gigis-Cupcakes_logo.jpg

283 ms

gnocfsj9sow72j3pcjew.jpg

gnocfsj9sow72j3pcjew.jpg

280 ms

Jasons-Deli_logo.jpg

Jasons-Deli_logo.jpg

253 ms

316313381_10100545704476449_4432026471922267388_n.jpg

316313381_10100545704476449_4432026471922267388_n.jpg

248 ms

SYLVAN-LEARNING-CENTER_LOGO.png

SYLVAN-LEARNING-CENTER_LOGO.png

240 ms

MyEyeDr._logo.jpg

MyEyeDr._logo.jpg

240 ms

SHOPPING-1.jpg

SHOPPING-1.jpg

250 ms

SERVICES-1.jpg

SERVICES-1.jpg

255 ms

DINING.jpg

DINING.jpg

252 ms

DIRECTORY-1.jpg

DIRECTORY-1.jpg

247 ms

weitzman.png

weitzman.png

238 ms

CEDAR-HILL-POINTE_HOME-1.jpg

CEDAR-HILL-POINTE_HOME-1.jpg

256 ms

js

js

79 ms

Accessibility Review

cedarhillpointe.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

cedarhillpointe.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cedarhillpointe.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedarhillpointe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedarhillpointe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cedarhillpointe.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cedar Hill Pointe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: