Tools & Wizards About Us
cedarmanorcare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

cedarmanorcare.com

Cedar Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

836 ms

cedarmanorcare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cedarmanorcare.com now to see the best up-to-date Cedar Manor Care content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cedarmanorcare.com

Caring. It’s what we do best. Focused on providing the best experience for your loved one. We are committed to caring for your loved one.

Visit cedarmanorcare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cedarmanorcare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cedarmanorcare.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.341

33/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.6 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cedarmanorcare.com

133 ms

cedarmanorcare.com

273 ms

init.css

307 ms

slick.css

288 ms

bdp-public.css

253 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Cedarmanorcare.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Cedarmanorcare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (14%)

Content Size

9.1 MB

After Optimization

7.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cedarmanorcare.com main page is 9.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 204.3 kB

  • Original 246.4 kB
  • After minification 241.3 kB
  • After compression 42.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 204.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 8.4 MB
  • After minification 7.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cedar Manor Care needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 408.4 kB
  • After minification 408.4 kB
  • After compression 401.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 138.7 kB
  • After minification 138.7 kB
  • After compression 133.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cedarmanorcare.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (84%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedar Manor Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cedarmanorcare.com

cedarmanorcare.com

133 ms

cedarmanorcare.com

cedarmanorcare.com

273 ms

init.css

init.css

307 ms

slick.css

slick.css

288 ms

bdp-public.css

bdp-public.css

253 ms

lju4xrd.css

lju4xrd.css

92 ms

wordpress-store-locator-public.css

wordpress-store-locator-public.css

210 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

222 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

58 ms

wordpress-store-locator-custom.css

wordpress-store-locator-custom.css

285 ms

trp-floater-language-switcher.css

trp-floater-language-switcher.css

427 ms

trp-language-switcher.css

trp-language-switcher.css

434 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

440 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

458 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

487 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

478 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

638 ms

css

css

60 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

642 ms

css

css

68 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

510 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

659 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

679 ms

choices.min.css

choices.min.css

692 ms

intl-tel-input.min.css

intl-tel-input.min.css

736 ms

richtext.min.css

richtext.min.css

845 ms

content.min.css

content.min.css

822 ms

wpforms-classic-full.min.css

wpforms-classic-full.min.css

858 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

852 ms

js

js

118 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

41 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

990 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1042 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1043 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

1113 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

1042 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

1092 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

1061 ms

salvattore.js

salvattore.js

1204 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

1202 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

1262 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

1257 ms

common.js

common.js

1333 ms

js

js

68 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

1296 ms

p.css

p.css

30 ms

maxmegamenu.js

maxmegamenu.js

1184 ms

public.js

public.js

1181 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1234 ms

wordpress-store-locator-public-single.js

wordpress-store-locator-public-single.js

1057 ms

wordpress-store-locator-public.js

wordpress-store-locator-public.js

1259 ms

wpforms.min.js

wpforms.min.js

1269 ms

custom-captcha.min.js

custom-captcha.min.js

1133 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1182 ms

jquery.inputmask.min.js

jquery.inputmask.min.js

1183 ms

mailcheck.min.js

mailcheck.min.js

1218 ms

punycode.min.js

punycode.min.js

1239 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

1313 ms

embed

embed

322 ms

Cedar-Manor-Logo.png

Cedar-Manor-Logo.png

818 ms

Facility-Home-Icons_Food.png

Facility-Home-Icons_Food.png

962 ms

ICON-Skilled-Quality-Care.png

ICON-Skilled-Quality-Care.png

1192 ms

Facility-Home-Icons_Connection.png

Facility-Home-Icons_Connection.png

907 ms

en_US.png

en_US.png

1055 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4uaVc.ttf

28 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

35 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

48 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

49 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

57 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

49 ms

d

d

18 ms

d

d

63 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

1002 ms

d

d

41 ms

d

d

47 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-3372-2-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-3372-2-late.css

922 ms

js

js

34 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

41 ms

Home-Page.png

Home-Page.png

431 ms

Assisted-Living.jpg

Assisted-Living.jpg

390 ms

Customer-Care-section-scaled-1.jpg

Customer-Care-section-scaled-1.jpg

290 ms

Accessibility Review

cedarmanorcare.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cedarmanorcare.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

cedarmanorcare.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedarmanorcare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedarmanorcare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cedarmanorcare.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cedar Manor Care. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: