Tools & Wizards About Us
cedarock.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

cedarock.com

Website Developer | Web Design | Digital Marketing | Traditional Marketing | Consulting

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

176 ms

Resources Loaded

766 ms

Page Rendered

739 ms

cedarock.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cedarock content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cedarock.com

We build responsive websites. Marketing strategy & consulting, content development, website development, website hosting, digital marketing, traditional marketing since 1996.

Visit cedarock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cedarock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cedarock.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cedarock.com

176 ms

www.cedarock.com

55 ms

cedarock.css

16 ms

cedarock.js

376 ms

taglinks.js

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Cedarock.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) belongs to the original domain Cedarock.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.0 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cedarock.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 38.9 kB

  • Original 45.6 kB
  • After minification 35.3 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.3 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 887 B

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cedarock images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 58.6 kB
  • After minification 55.7 kB
  • After compression 40.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 41.9 kB

  • Original 47.3 kB
  • After minification 32.0 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cedarock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (7%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

64

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedarock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cedarock.com

cedarock.com

176 ms

www.cedarock.com

www.cedarock.com

55 ms

cedarock.css

cedarock.css

16 ms

cedarock.js

cedarock.js

376 ms

taglinks.js

taglinks.js

30 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

22 ms

webticker.min.js

webticker.min.js

82 ms

scrollreveal.min.js

scrollreveal.min.js

24 ms

js

js

60 ms

header-logo-25-years.png

header-logo-25-years.png

67 ms

header-logo-25-years-hover.png

header-logo-25-years-hover.png

66 ms

header-logo.png

header-logo.png

64 ms

home-hero-2600.jpg

home-hero-2600.jpg

102 ms

client-logos-radicom.png

client-logos-radicom.png

66 ms

client-logos-reiche.png

client-logos-reiche.png

95 ms

client-logos-atp2.png

client-logos-atp2.png

96 ms

client-logos-rightway.png

client-logos-rightway.png

95 ms

client-logos-lab.png

client-logos-lab.png

95 ms

client-logos-np.png

client-logos-np.png

96 ms

client-logos-csi.png

client-logos-csi.png

97 ms

client-logos-ohio.png

client-logos-ohio.png

97 ms

client-logos-jayrs.png

client-logos-jayrs.png

95 ms

client-logos-schoolstreet.png

client-logos-schoolstreet.png

98 ms

client-logos-landmark.png

client-logos-landmark.png

98 ms

client-logos-peshtigo.png

client-logos-peshtigo.png

99 ms

client-logos-foamwerks.png

client-logos-foamwerks.png

106 ms

client-logos-mcnelly2.png

client-logos-mcnelly2.png

98 ms

client-logos-entre.png

client-logos-entre.png

99 ms

client-logos-tol.png

client-logos-tol.png

100 ms

client-logos-ccd.png

client-logos-ccd.png

101 ms

client-logos-waukboard.png

client-logos-waukboard.png

102 ms

client-logos-hmt.png

client-logos-hmt.png

102 ms

client-logos-nextstep.png

client-logos-nextstep.png

103 ms

client-logos-bbb2.png

client-logos-bbb2.png

104 ms

client-logos-mcgrath.png

client-logos-mcgrath.png

104 ms

client-logos-homeaces.png

client-logos-homeaces.png

105 ms

client-logos-gallimore.png

client-logos-gallimore.png

106 ms

client-logos-aaa.png

client-logos-aaa.png

105 ms

client-logos-cressey.png

client-logos-cressey.png

107 ms

client-logos-horizon.png

client-logos-horizon.png

107 ms

client-logos-hansen.png

client-logos-hansen.png

110 ms

client-logos-cylinders.png

client-logos-cylinders.png

108 ms

client-logos-logan.png

client-logos-logan.png

110 ms

client-logos-hartland2.png

client-logos-hartland2.png

108 ms

client-logos-paramount.png

client-logos-paramount.png

46 ms

client-logos-crs911.png

client-logos-crs911.png

47 ms

client-logos-boosterspark.png

client-logos-boosterspark.png

47 ms

client-logos-dic.png

client-logos-dic.png

47 ms

crimsontext-regular-webfont.woff

crimsontext-regular-webfont.woff

47 ms

raleway-black-webfont.woff

raleway-black-webfont.woff

29 ms

crimsontext-bold-webfont.woff

crimsontext-bold-webfont.woff

29 ms

crimsontext-italic-webfont.woff

crimsontext-italic-webfont.woff

28 ms

client-logos-elan.png

client-logos-elan.png

29 ms

client-logos-mielke.png

client-logos-mielke.png

26 ms

our-work-boosterspark24.jpg

our-work-boosterspark24.jpg

29 ms

home-recentwork-arrow-left.png

home-recentwork-arrow-left.png

27 ms

home-recentwork-arrow-right.png

home-recentwork-arrow-right.png

27 ms

our-work-logan.jpg

our-work-logan.jpg

29 ms

our-work-cressey.jpg

our-work-cressey.jpg

27 ms

our-work-elan.jpg

our-work-elan.jpg

28 ms

our-work-hmtWEB.jpg

our-work-hmtWEB.jpg

32 ms

our-work-ccd.jpg

our-work-ccd.jpg

26 ms

our-work-atpWEB.jpg

our-work-atpWEB.jpg

29 ms

parallax-html-code.png

parallax-html-code.png

27 ms

separator-top-e8e8e8.png

separator-top-e8e8e8.png

26 ms

icons-strategy-pewter.png

icons-strategy-pewter.png

25 ms

icons-content-pewter.png

icons-content-pewter.png

26 ms

icons-development-pewter.png

icons-development-pewter.png

25 ms

icons-hosting-pewter.png

icons-hosting-pewter.png

25 ms

icons-digital-pewter.png

icons-digital-pewter.png

26 ms

icons-traditional-pewter.png

icons-traditional-pewter.png

24 ms

separator-bottom.png

separator-bottom.png

24 ms

home-letter-graphic.jpg

home-letter-graphic.jpg

34 ms

separator-top.png

separator-top.png

24 ms

five-stars.png

five-stars.png

24 ms

Accessibility Review

cedarock.com accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cedarock.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cedarock.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedarock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedarock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cedarock.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cedarock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: