Tools & Wizards About Us
cedarpark.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

cedarpark.org

Home | Cedar Park Church

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

128 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

407 ms

cedarpark.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to cedarpark.org homepage info - get ready to check Cedar Park best content for Pakistan right away, or after learning these important things about cedarpark.org

Cedar Park Church

Visit cedarpark.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Cedarpark.org page load time and found that the first response time was 128 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cedarpark.org performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cedarpark.org

128 ms

cedarpark.org

261 ms

www.cedarpark.org

429 ms

js

70 ms

application-6c0e42fe0fa78f056c6311258e4f2e1a0c2a2f2bc097d616efd9fc1ab7418453.css

310 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Cedarpark.org, 14% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (605 ms) belongs to the original domain Cedarpark.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 439.4 kB (22%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cedarpark.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 34.2 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cedar Park images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 221.4 kB

  • Original 317.8 kB
  • After minification 317.8 kB
  • After compression 96.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 180.8 kB

  • Original 211.8 kB
  • After minification 210.8 kB
  • After compression 31.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cedarpark.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 180.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (26%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedar Park. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cedarpark.org

cedarpark.org

128 ms

cedarpark.org

cedarpark.org

261 ms

www.cedarpark.org

www.cedarpark.org

429 ms

js

js

70 ms

application-6c0e42fe0fa78f056c6311258e4f2e1a0c2a2f2bc097d616efd9fc1ab7418453.css

application-6c0e42fe0fa78f056c6311258e4f2e1a0c2a2f2bc097d616efd9fc1ab7418453.css

310 ms

css

css

42 ms

application-92ffee612900c1dd811a08989064578e209055040c44c3d7e4042162b139268b.js

application-92ffee612900c1dd811a08989064578e209055040c44c3d7e4042162b139268b.js

501 ms

v1

v1

34 ms

9c0fcbace8.js

9c0fcbace8.js

114 ms

materialdesignicons.min.css

materialdesignicons.min.css

19 ms

materialdesignicons.min.css

materialdesignicons.min.css

4 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

147 ms

292628494

292628494

343 ms

icon_logo_cool-bf2f78344af400f5c00c51855eaffc4280ea717951cf8d1c2831e995d6014302.png

icon_logo_cool-bf2f78344af400f5c00c51855eaffc4280ea717951cf8d1c2831e995d6014302.png

200 ms

logo_light_prime-8f80127563644adf1f6d1e888914cd15567557068225248c60e1c995f7236482.svg

logo_light_prime-8f80127563644adf1f6d1e888914cd15567557068225248c60e1c995f7236482.svg

201 ms

logo_dark_long-e2368004f48a110f44ddfcad9f6ae140b6df3025abf86ba7e8721f80b8a93641.png

logo_dark_long-e2368004f48a110f44ddfcad9f6ae140b6df3025abf86ba7e8721f80b8a93641.png

250 ms

default_slider-ac7e70ecdf3baed641942597cbfc6ac3498d82e988da2bca5e661cf0db8fddc5.jpg

default_slider-ac7e70ecdf3baed641942597cbfc6ac3498d82e988da2bca5e661cf0db8fddc5.jpg

315 ms

default_image-ac7e70ecdf3baed641942597cbfc6ac3498d82e988da2bca5e661cf0db8fddc5.jpg

default_image-ac7e70ecdf3baed641942597cbfc6ac3498d82e988da2bca5e661cf0db8fddc5.jpg

605 ms

DIV_5353.jpg

DIV_5353.jpg

557 ms

Web%20header%2016x9_.jpg

Web%20header%2016x9_.jpg

435 ms

IMG_0024.jpg

IMG_0024.jpg

436 ms

8N7A2783.jpg

8N7A2783.jpg

375 ms

logo_dark-290bd5efe15b1117a27476fbebc1e9cd9f1406265c255622649dd7b98506b8ba.svg

logo_dark-290bd5efe15b1117a27476fbebc1e9cd9f1406265c255622649dd7b98506b8ba.svg

376 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

64 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

66 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

87 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

88 ms

materialdesignicons-webfont.woff

materialdesignicons-webfont.woff

45 ms

api.js

api.js

11 ms

Accessibility Review

cedarpark.org accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

cedarpark.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cedarpark.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedarpark.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cedarpark.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

cedarpark.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cedar Park. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: