Tools & Wizards About Us
cedars.cc screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

cedars.cc

Cedars Auto Intelligence, Sourcing Service Supplier

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

246 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

494 ms

cedars.cc screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Cedars content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cedars.cc

Founded in 2007, Cedars has been specializing in automotive intelligence and sourcing business and is committed to being your reliable supplier.

Visit cedars.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Cedars.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 246 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cedars.cc performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.626

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cedars.cc

246 ms

js

71 ms

style.css

1397 ms

public.css

1697 ms

swiper.min.css

1772 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cedars.cc, 82% (42 requests) were made to Cdn.globalso.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Formcs.globalso.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.globalso.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 199.9 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cedars.cc main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 41.1 kB

  • Original 51.5 kB
  • After minification 45.5 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 107.0 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cedars images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 40.8 kB

  • Original 335.0 kB
  • After minification 335.0 kB
  • After compression 294.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.8 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 37.9 kB
  • After minification 37.9 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cedars.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (24%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedars. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cedars.cc

cedars.cc

246 ms

js

js

71 ms

style.css

style.css

1397 ms

public.css

public.css

1697 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

1772 ms

right-arrow.png

right-arrow.png

5 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

1537 ms

BANNER0713.jpg

BANNER0713.jpg

2038 ms

Intelligence.jpg

Intelligence.jpg

2090 ms

Sourcing2.jpg

Sourcing2.jpg

1920 ms

Investment.jpg

Investment.jpg

1841 ms

CEIBS.png

CEIBS.png

1803 ms

CFAO.png

CFAO.png

2307 ms

GB-Auto.png

GB-Auto.png

2186 ms

Gildemeister.png

Gildemeister.png

1923 ms

IESE.png

IESE.png

2268 ms

Inchcape.png

Inchcape.png

2047 ms

Indra.png

Indra.png

2468 ms

Indumotora.png

Indumotora.png

2141 ms

Roland-Berger1.png

Roland-Berger1.png

2404 ms

Union1.png

Union1.png

2433 ms

Ambacar.png

Ambacar.png

2320 ms

mannheim.png

mannheim.png

2518 ms

Bajaj1.png

Bajaj1.png

2417 ms

autoeastern.png

autoeastern.png

2648 ms

SADAR1.png

SADAR1.png

2857 ms

generate.js

generate.js

677 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2952 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

2753 ms

common.js

common.js

2695 ms

public.js

public.js

2602 ms

title_pic.png

title_pic.png

2656 ms

translator-dropdown.js

translator-dropdown.js

906 ms

generate.js

generate.js

1070 ms

header-textures.png

header-textures.png

1399 ms

page-ico.png

page-ico.png

1298 ms

all-m.gif

all-m.gif

1538 ms

download.jpg

download.jpg

1976 ms

foot-bg.png

foot-bg.png

1409 ms

icons01.png

icons01.png

1540 ms

close.png

close.png

1585 ms

show_btn.png

show_btn.png

2031 ms

mautic-form.js

mautic-form.js

213 ms

SourceSansPro-Regular.otf

SourceSansPro-Regular.otf

1547 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1663 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1984 ms

SourceSansPro-Semibold.otf

SourceSansPro-Semibold.otf

1752 ms

modal.min.css

modal.min.css

213 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

69 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

294 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

377 ms

Accessibility Review

cedars.cc accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cedars.cc best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

cedars.cc SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedars.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedars.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cedars.cc

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cedars. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: