Tools & Wizards About Us
cedarsprings.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

cedarsprings.net

Landscaping Company | Oakville/Burlington/GTA | Cedar Springs

Page Load Speed

632 ms in total

First Response

69 ms

Resources Loaded

301 ms

Page Rendered

262 ms

cedarsprings.net screenshot

About Website

Visit cedarsprings.net now to see the best up-to-date Cedar Springs content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cedarsprings.net

Looking for a landscape company? Cedar Springs can help bring the resort experience home! Check out landscaping packages starting at just $15,000.

Visit cedarsprings.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Cedarsprings.net page load time and found that the first response time was 69 ms and then it took 563 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cedarsprings.net performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cedarsprings.net

69 ms

all.1436290994.css

24 ms

all.min.1444239490.js

43 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

11 ms

gtm.js

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Cedarsprings.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (130 ms) relates to the external source Static.hotjar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 16.3 kB (1%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Cedarsprings.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cedar Springs images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 22.8 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (10%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedar Springs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cedarsprings.net

cedarsprings.net

69 ms

all.1436290994.css

all.1436290994.css

24 ms

all.min.1444239490.js

all.min.1444239490.js

43 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

11 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

55 ms

wood_texture.png

wood_texture.png

47 ms

sand_texture.png

sand_texture.png

47 ms

shadows.png

shadows.png

50 ms

masthead_bg.png

masthead_bg.png

47 ms

cedar_springs_logo.png

cedar_springs_logo.png

47 ms

tagline.png

tagline.png

48 ms

leaves.png

leaves.png

48 ms

content_gradient.png

content_gradient.png

49 ms

clouds.jpg

clouds.jpg

49 ms

content_base_shadow.png

content_base_shadow.png

48 ms

home_page_sprites.png

home_page_sprites.png

50 ms

banner_home_5_star_landscapes_2.jpg

banner_home_5_star_landscapes_2.jpg

60 ms

banner_home_bring_the_resort_experience_home.jpg

banner_home_bring_the_resort_experience_home.jpg

63 ms

banner_home_inspired_by_nature_2.jpg

banner_home_inspired_by_nature_2.jpg

64 ms

banner_home_guided_by_experience_2.jpg

banner_home_guided_by_experience_2.jpg

75 ms

banner_home_defined_by_character_2.jpg

banner_home_defined_by_character_2.jpg

77 ms

social_media_icons.png

social_media_icons.png

60 ms

home_page_ads_2.jpg

home_page_ads_2.jpg

74 ms

home_page_ad_price_guide.jpg

home_page_ad_price_guide.jpg

64 ms

ad_bgd_mower_bag.jpg

ad_bgd_mower_bag.jpg

74 ms

customers_testimonials.png

customers_testimonials.png

74 ms

footer_phone.png

footer_phone.png

75 ms

footer_social_icons.png

footer_social_icons.png

76 ms

cedarspringsbook-webfont.woff

cedarspringsbook-webfont.woff

39 ms

cedarspringsbold-webfont.woff

cedarspringsbold-webfont.woff

40 ms

cedarspringslight-webfont.woff

cedarspringslight-webfont.woff

42 ms

cedarspringscondensed-webfont.woff

cedarspringscondensed-webfont.woff

41 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

6 ms

hotjar-151402.js

hotjar-151402.js

130 ms

collect

collect

3 ms

collect

collect

69 ms

Accessibility Review

cedarsprings.net accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.

Best Practices

cedarsprings.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cedarsprings.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedarsprings.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedarsprings.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

cedarsprings.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cedar Springs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: