Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

cedarwood.digital

Digital Marketing Agency Manchester | Cedarwood Digital

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

545 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

cedarwood.digital screenshot

About Website

Visit cedarwood.digital now to see the best up-to-date Cedarwood content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cedarwood.digital

Performance Marketing Agency With A Track Record To Deliver At Cedarwood Digital, we’ve spent years helping businesses just like yours to be seen online. Don’t just take our word for it, read through ...

Visit cedarwood.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Cedarwood.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 545 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cedarwood.digital performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.072

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cedarwood.digital

545 ms

cedarwood.digital

119 ms

Cedarwood-Digital_Master-Logo_RGB_No-background.png

477 ms

email-decode.min.js

25 ms

lazyload.min.js

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Cedarwood.digital, 1% (1 request) were made to Gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Api.ecologi.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Cedarwood.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 506.7 kB (17%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Cedarwood.digital main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 493.5 kB

  • Original 584.1 kB
  • After minification 584.1 kB
  • After compression 90.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 493.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cedarwood images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

75

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cedarwood. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

cedarwood.digital accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cedarwood.digital best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

cedarwood.digital SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedarwood.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedarwood.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Cedarwood. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: