4.7 sec in total
171 ms
3.6 sec
986 ms
Click here to check amazing CEDIA content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about cedia.net
CEDIA is the leading global organisation for the smart home technology industry. For both Smart Home Professionals and Smart Homeowners, discover CEDIA today.
Visit cedia.netWe analyzed Cedia.net page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
cedia.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.1 s
3/100
10%
Value1,460 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
171 ms
330 ms
1628 ms
85 ms
458 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Cedia.net, 71% (32 requests) were made to Cedia.org and 4% (2 requests) were made to Securepubads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Cedia.org.
Page size can be reduced by 109.6 kB (9%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Cedia.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 896.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CEDIA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 816 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cedia.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (35%)
37
24
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CEDIA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
cedia.net
171 ms
cedia.net
330 ms
cedia.org
1628 ms
main.css
85 ms
0ea40f4c82327bae9d350920404186da.js
458 ms
gpt.js
95 ms
jquery.js
170 ms
build.js
321 ms
main.js
244 ms
jssocials.min.js
251 ms
node-marquee.min.js
250 ms
gtm.js
220 ms
logo.svg
130 ms
search.svg
168 ms
cedia-hero.1920x999.jpg
545 ms
a-16346_control4.160x160.jpg
166 ms
crestron.160x160.jpg
168 ms
a-8061_d_h_distributing.160x160.jpg
168 ms
a-312065_kohler.160x160.jpg
166 ms
1.png
246 ms
a-353367_amazon-ring.160x160.jpg
246 ms
2.png
247 ms
quote.svg
247 ms
fa0.jpg
404 ms
fa1.jpg
398 ms
small-dec0.jpg
383 ms
small-dec1.jpg
383 ms
smart_home_integrators.530x389.jpg
484 ms
smart_home_trade_supplier-2.530x389.jpg
473 ms
cedia_design_and_build.530x389.jpg
485 ms
cedia_homeowners.530x389.png
796 ms
smart_home_podcast.444x443.jpg
486 ms
pubads_impl.js
61 ms
Inter-Light.ttf
793 ms
Sora-Regular.ttf
571 ms
Sora-Light.ttf
601 ms
Inter-Medium.ttf
675 ms
Sora-Thin.ttf
641 ms
js
48 ms
inject-v3.min.js
31 ms
preprocessor.min.js
30 ms
sl.js
142 ms
boomerang.min.js
142 ms
r
25 ms
i
3 ms
cedia.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
cedia.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
cedia.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cedia.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Cedia.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
cedia.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of CEDIA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: