Tools & Wizards About Us
ceepod.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

ceepod.com

Ceepod Freedom Device, Next Generation Smart Television Solutions

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

495 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

484 ms

ceepod.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ceepod.com homepage info - get ready to check Ceepod best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about ceepod.com

Ceepod freedom device will offer you auto sync capability and Innovative stream share device will help you to watch different content in different rooms.

Visit ceepod.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ceepod.com page load time and found that the first response time was 495 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ceepod.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

ceepod.com

495 ms

bootstrap.min.css

286 ms

font-awesome.css

352 ms

stroke-font.css

526 ms

animate.min.css

479 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Ceepod.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ceepod.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (50%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ceepod.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 801.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

  • Original 33.0 kB
  • After minification 25.8 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 801.0 kB
  • After minification 790.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ceepod images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 397.6 kB

  • Original 541.6 kB
  • After minification 382.4 kB
  • After compression 143.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 397.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 638.1 kB

  • Original 782.5 kB
  • After minification 713.1 kB
  • After compression 144.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ceepod.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 638.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (60%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ceepod. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ceepod.com

ceepod.com

495 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

286 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

352 ms

stroke-font.css

stroke-font.css

526 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

479 ms

style.css

style.css

475 ms

custom.css

custom.css

295 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

25 ms

wpapp-styles.css

wpapp-styles.css

381 ms

styles.css

styles.css

382 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

563 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

481 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1058 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

664 ms

parallax.js

parallax.js

664 ms

retina.js

retina.js

663 ms

bxslider.js

bxslider.js

669 ms

circle-progress.js

circle-progress.js

666 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

792 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

666 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

666 ms

scroll.js

scroll.js

760 ms

custom.js

custom.js

760 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

794 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

794 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

458 ms

Ajwc_AOBivA

Ajwc_AOBivA

158 ms

logo.png

logo.png

429 ms

slider-old2.jpg

slider-old2.jpg

489 ms

head.png

head.png

490 ms

ceepod-1.png

ceepod-1.png

493 ms

parallax_01.jpg

parallax_01.jpg

495 ms

networking.png

networking.png

491 ms

sync-symbol.png

sync-symbol.png

491 ms

monitor-1.png

monitor-1.png

490 ms

shield.png

shield.png

493 ms

testi_02.png

testi_02.png

494 ms

testi_01.png

testi_01.png

495 ms

testi_03.png

testi_03.png

649 ms

border-normal.png

border-normal.png

650 ms

parallax_04.jpg

parallax_04.jpg

895 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

AvenirNextLTPro-Cn.woff

AvenirNextLTPro-Cn.woff

575 ms

AvenirNextLTPro-Regular.woff

AvenirNextLTPro-Regular.woff

576 ms

AvenirNextLTPro-Demi.woff

AvenirNextLTPro-Demi.woff

635 ms

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

636 ms

AvenirNextLTPro-Bold.woff

AvenirNextLTPro-Bold.woff

635 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

30 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

74 ms

base.js

base.js

109 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

27 ms

btn_paynowCC_LG.gif

btn_paynowCC_LG.gif

70 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

266 ms

VM1LbcxuQZ7urdjSm15-Kft2IdlldgxYJTjOL3p1Mjw.js

VM1LbcxuQZ7urdjSm15-Kft2IdlldgxYJTjOL3p1Mjw.js

194 ms

embed.js

embed.js

71 ms

id

id

62 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

147 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

148 ms

SEO Factors

ceepod.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ceepod.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ceepod.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ceepod.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ceepod. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: